Fair response, I get where you are coming from.
Even if all of that is true and even if a bunch of things came true, here is my thought:
There was absolutely no need for any info drop through Q. All that Trump had to do was just to have weekly fireside chats over his own streaming service (while taking calls and questions) with 80+ million followers and:
a) He would have scared everyone shitless. 80+ million people is SCARY for the other side. They don't have devoted followers, they have only elitists and wannabe elitists that hate normies.
b) A ton of people on the other side would have seen Trump as a real person and not the monster msm paints him as. Trump is very personable and likeable one on one. If Trump tooks some heavy questions from the left and just said "hmm .. I don't know, let me look into that for you" and he would have broken a huge chunk of the democratic voters off for him self.
c) He could have brought the policy level down to the people and let people suggest and provide thoughts on various policies that would have made people feel like they had a modicum of input and control. Right now we have globalist pedo elitists flying around the world telling us to shut down our business. If he fielded questions from people about the shutdowns he could have even organized an insurrection against state lockdowns in a way that no state could EVER have resisted in any way possible because of the sheer number of people.
This is why Q is not real. It isn't necessary. The government and the world isn't full of scoobiedoo mysteries. I admit that conspiracies and such exist of course, but none of them require anything like Q.
It only gets worse, not only are Q info drops not necessary, globalists don't even lie to us about their globalist plans. They write papers and policies in plain sight and DIRECTLY tell us what is happening. The biggest coverup happening is they use lawyer doublespeak to leave out critical details and mask the truth of what they are saying, but they are saying everything they will do in plain sight.
Here is an example: https://www.bitchute.com/video/h8hHvqWEXw7s/
Please note, I am not trying to prove you wrong, this isn't a challenge. I think what is happening is that your brains are too powerful for the world around you. The world around is dumber than you might at first believe and your genuine incredulity at this is keeping your pattern matching systems in place searching for deeper meaning and truth.
When there isn't any. The world is truly run by the stupid. People that get degrees are NOT smart. They are only the most compliant monkeys that will jump through all the artifical hoops and roll over on command. Yet, these fuckers end up in government and other control points of the system.
This was a more fruitful response than I had anticipated. I'm addressing your comments sequentially.
As far as the 'need' for Q drops; at best that's debatable and without knowing the plan is going to be speculation. I believe you are overly optimistic on what Trump could have accomplished through fireside chats. Remember, he wasn't even sworn in when they were discussing impeachment.
a) Yes, the increase in populism that Trump has seen should be a concern, but when the bad guys were already anticipating to reduce the world population to 500 million, I'm not sure that 'the people' are a 'concern' as much as 'a problem to be dealt with'.
b) This is a good point, my opinion is that the TDS had already been implanted. There's really not much rational discussion to be had with people so vested in the continuation of the status quo.
c) Possibly valid, but remember, Fauci and friends all started talking about Covid as something to not worry about until it had a chance to spread. THEN they demanded social controls. Even then they started counting deaths as "Trumps fault". Even with his initial cabinet, somewhere around 3/4 of them were all comped. Even those that appeared clean were just biding time.
You seem to be treating the Trump presidency like it could be compared with when Bush was inaugurated. The deep state clearly saw Trump as a threat early on.
As for if Q was 'necessary' to avoid the more detrimental planned outcomes, I could only guess. I understand your point about the scoobie doo mysteries. That was one that annoyed me of followers early on. Guys like SBBH would post these intricate deciphers of inane posts finding codes and even describing a method, the thing is that he wasn't even logically consistent in his deciphering and was clearly trying to fill in what was wanted. As a test, I tried to replicate a simple sentence code that could have 2 meanings and it was near impossible and would not be a code that could reasonably be used as comms. All in an effort to figure out the plan, but there was never enough information provided to make predictions, only confirmations after the fact.... and when you add in double (or more) meanings, some statements get confirmed from multiple angles.
Where Q really did benefit was focusing people to dig deeper into the MKUltra, sex slavery, Epstein and Weinstein types, etc. That many people would dismiss (and still do) UNTIL they see for themselves.
You're also accurate about the globalists not being shy about their plans, consider that this has been the case at least for decades. How many people have become aware of this type of information compared to pre-Q / Trump?
Your last point about the world being run by mainly stupid people, I can't disagree. It's rather shocking how stupid some can be and still manage to keep their roles. The high level globablists are more cunning, not necessarily smarter and by thinking in longer terms is a big factor in how people can be controlled. If you tell people to plan 1 move ahead in a game of chess while you are planning your moves 3-4 moves ahead, even mistakes made can be corrected by the time it makes your opponent's radar.
Great response, thanks!
I will agree that Q did get a LOT of people to start looking into things. This is perhaps why the media started to jump on the Q thing at the very end. Partially they wanted to smear, but, I suspect that people higher up were worried about the JQ making it further out there than their containment efforts allowed.
Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it.
Cheers, appreciate that you were actually serious in your inquiries. I don't particularly care about being mocked, but I'm also more level headed and not diving in. It was about a year into reading Q posts that it was clear that any "codes" were to be simple enough that most anyone could decipher the intent, but not the strategy.
Frankly, I do still expect that Trump will win in a new election and return to office, although I'm seeing more people trying to argue that Trump was never going to get a second term. Though at this stage all that really remains is the general faith that's got me this far "everything works out for the best in the end."
(post is archived)