WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

453

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

That is not the statement I made. It's dishonest.

The words in quotes were a sarcastic summary, obviously.

This "fake Biden" is a waste of your time. Even if you can prove it with experts in forensic facial analysis, it's not going anywhere. No normie will give you the time of day.

Summarized as:

"truth doesn't matter! You're wasting your energy!"

Explain how that doesn't work. I'll wait.

[–] 0 pt

As you should know, a quote is verbatim. I'm not trying to be your English teacher here, but you can't take words written and combine them to make a new sentence. That's dishonest.

>"Explain how that doesn't work."

This is an exact quote.

Example: Crensch knocked the fan over and it fell on a pile of shit. Shit was flung all over the place. Some of it landed on his head.

Erroneous non-verbatim quote: "Crensch is a shit head."

See? How that is incorrect?

[–] 0 pt

As you should know, a quote is verbatim. I'm not trying to be your English teacher here, but you can't take words written and combine them to make a new sentence. That's dishonest.

https://thewritepractice.com/when-you-use-quotation-marks/

Number 3.

Air quotes designate that what you’re saying should not be taken at face value. You are being sarcastic or lying outright. In your writing, they’re used in the same way.

Now get the fuck off my lawn.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I'll try to simplify it for you. When quoting multiple sentences to convey a fluid recapitulation, use from this:

Example:

>"Crensch knocked the fan over and it fell on a pile of shit. Shit was flung all over the place. Some of it landed on his head".

Proper method:

>"Crensch"..... [got] "shit"..... "on his head".

See, this is a proper method of quoting someone. Otherwise, blending sentences can easily change the meaning.

Now, your other statement:

>".... get the fuck off my lawn."

should be more properly "Please sir, can you get off of my lawn?". :) ;)