WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

I am not sure who called for the NG but they are set up like they are staying awhile.

I am not sure who called for the NG but they are set up like they are staying awhile.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

His legacy? Do you think after being impeached twice, Trump was concerned about his legacy? This is laughable. The Commander-in-Chief (President Trump) has sole authority of the National Guard in Washington DC. Furthermore, under a National Emergency order, it is the Commander-in-Chief, who presides over the NG.

The National Guard in DC had to be approved by President Trump unless it was designated by EO to delegate this responsibility to a State Department. It was not the Dimwits and Nancy Pelosi that have any authority in this regard. Congress has authority to use the Washington DC police for security.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The National Guard in DC had to be approved by President Trump

I think I stated his approval twice and never said otherwise.

and

Do you think after being impeached twice, Trump was concerned about his legacy?

yes certainly.

you are throwing in the "impeached twice" as if that is a separate instance from what we are talking about with the troops--kike leagues. The second impeachment and troop deployment surrounded the same issue and are inseparable (if anything the troop deployment would be because of the impeachment--to quell a mass uprising).

That man cares about his legacy more than anything at this point. What else is he after?

____

ps. Just because he has sole authority, there are still politics at play: shutting down an inauguration is like crapping on some kids Christmas for no good reason. With all those slimy bastards and your own waning authority: the incoming president and his cronies would have quite a bit of influence in this situation as it is "his party" and is about to assume with vengeance all of your waning power.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

>"That man cares about his legacy more than anything at this point. What else is he after?"

You don't know his motives nor do I. Speculating on something is to "Assume". Your legacy part just doesn't ring for me, especially phrasing it like it is a fact. I believe Trump was trying to do the right thing for America and to return us to Constitutional principles. Now, this is my belief and I won't ever pose something like this as fact. There is far more than you know or I. Speculation is like spitting in the wind.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I know that he has devoted his life to accumulate material wealth. I doubt more crap he can buy will make him happy. Power as a mogul, and notoriety as a house name is beyond the dreams of any peer.

Then top that off with POTUS

He is getting older.

He not only wants to help--he wants to be loved by the population.

I may be wrong--but imagine: you have all the material shit you ever could want, so much so that it doesn't even matter anymore that you have it, but you can get it. That is where power comes into play.

...skipping some steps: lets imagine that you get enough power to influence in some way anything there is under the sun. This leads to a level of isolation--I honestly think his appeal was to the American people, as a friend. You could become the "evil dictator" and close off the world, but that just doesn't fit Trump (he isn't that jewish--this was not a simple means-to-end [and if it were, where did it get him]).{edit: he definitely was not altruistic in his bid for president--but "his heart was in it" and that is almost so obvious I will not clarify here}

I'm just bullshitting here with you--If I were in the minds of those who rule us, I wouldn't be ruled for starters (but here we are mass-brainstorming and feeding intel to glows).