not a completed crime until it has been carried out
You don't know the law. Conspiracy to commit a crime is enough to get a warrant and arrest people.
If someone was planning on murdering someone, and that information was brought to law enforcement, would law enforcement wait for the killing to happen? Or would they act preemptively?
Oh wait, it's you. You're going to say "Q drop 1423 says preemptive action is bad optics so you're a shill!!" or something, right?
> not a completed crime until it has been carried out
You don't know the law. Conspiracy to commit a crime is enough to get a warrant and arrest people.
If someone was planning on murdering someone, and that information was brought to law enforcement, would law enforcement wait for the killing to happen? Or would they act preemptively?
Oh wait, it's you. You're going to say "Q drop 1423 says preemptive action is bad optics so you're a shill!!" or something, right?
you sound like a Democrat all you need is a allegation, no proof required. you watch to much TV.
you sound like a Democrat all you need is a allegation, no proof required. you watch to much TV.
(post is archived)