He says a lot of things. I’ve got an open tab on him of things he said that have never been verified. He’s one of those guys that I don’t understand why he gets the ear of the Q anon community. I just don’t understand why some of these people get attention. He’s one of them. But if he nailed this, then I was completely wrong about him. If she is resigning anyway I don’t know why she wouldn’t make some kind of public appearance or gesture or some kind of statement. If she doesn’t that’s going to be very suspicious.
Ill disbelieve when shes seen alive. Until then it's just a text from her assistant
has anyone seen a picture or video of her live after the alleged germany server raid?
No one has any video of her since election day, nothing
Fair enough. I’m just the other way around. Someone makes a big claim, like the death of Gina Haspel, I go the other way. I want to see some evidence of the death. I don’t expect her to have to prove she’s alive when she’s not the one that made the more “outrageous” claim.
But I got to admit it’s pretty damn suspicious…
Gonna have to disagree... my thinking is this
There is a crazy conspiracy theory like the Cia director was killed in a firefight in Germany! Something out of a Tom Clancy novel! Tons of American believe it and they are pushing this crazy theory...
So in less then 15 seconds the the Cia lady could make an appearance with Trump and then it's all over? With almost zero effort.
Why the fuck do we have to go crazy trying to prove this shit when it could be solved in 15 seconds by the govemrent we own and pay for?
Do you know any other retired generals giving us information? if you do and they contradict mcinerney, I think we'd all be really interested to hear what they have to say
So in order for McInerney to be wrong he needs to be contradicted by retired generals? He can’t just be making shit up? I’m not even saying that he is. I don’t know if he is or not. All I know is, he has made a lot of claims and I haven’t seen proof of one of them.
And even if he’s giving us bad Intel it doesn’t mean he’s lying. He could just be passing on that information from someone he trusts. He could be wrong. He could be mistaken. It could be a misunderstanding. It could be mis or dis info. It could be a lot of things.
I just don’t understand the immediate obedience to someone who has done very little to back up many of his outrageous claims, some of them that have clearly been forgotten about by now.
Some people do for generals and ex-mil what liberals do for doctors and put them on a pedestal. They think they’re above lying, above reproach, can’t be questioned, because some people have never met generals or have never met doctors.
He may be right about everything he said. I even mentioned that in one of my comments in this very thread. It’s very possible that I am wrong about him and he is spot on. Perfectly open minded to that. I also make the observation that I don’t understand why people immediately believe everything he says. Maybe you don’t, but a lot of people do. They take everything he says is gospel. I think it’s unwarranted as of right now.
I think people believe it for a couple simple reasons.
- How hard is it to become a general? Very very fucking difficult
- Are the people that become generals normally pretty smart? Yes
- Are they respected on many levels? Yes
- Do they care about their reputations? Yes
- Do they care about their legacy? Yes
- Do they have giant egos? Usually
So with that being said is the guy going to destroy his lifetimes work? I would say not on purpose but as you pointed out maybe he is being played I think people believe him because of what I said and it also fits into the story or the plan
No shit I want to see this cunt live in front of a TV so we all know what the traitors look like
You make a really good point. Military retirement includes a non-disclosure contract. There are also Terms and Conditions for receiving a military pension. Most certainly ex-military personal, who have held security clearances can not ever reveal classified information. So, how did McInerney reveal this information about a raid in Germany and Haspel's fate? The only logical way he knew and could talk about it is he was given permission to do so under contract. He may have been used for DisInfo purposes as well. This is actually a quite common in government. How many times has a retired general been rolled out to speak and to discuss a narrative?
Or he’s telling the truth and he’s a complete bad ass that doesn’t give a shit about whether he’s allowed to do the right thing or not. Look I’m not trying to defame the guy he might be telling the truth. He might be lying. I’m not even pretending to know. But if I’m going by direct claims to direct proof, he’s not really shown me much over the years. Doesn’t mean he’s wrong! Like I said, he could be the worlds biggest badass and he’s breaking it down for us at great risk his own personal safety. He could be one of our greatest American heroes for all I know.
He doesn’t bother me at all it’s the people that believe everything he says without any drop of skepticism whatsoever. And really, that’s just me being a grouch. People have every right to trust whoever the hell they want I’m just being an asshole.
Quite right. Ever see a retired military officer interviewed on a TV network claiming one thing only for it to be later countered by another retired military officer on another network? We simply don't know what the truth really is. However, my observation and belief is that even the ABC government Agencies battle each other over competing or conflicting narratives. The CIA and FBI have full time personnel at desks in the MSM network building. Operation Mockingbird is very alive and is worse than ever. These retired military 'experts' are paid to say what they propagate on the air waves. I don't know about McIinary. He seems like a very likable individual, but It's pretty plausible he was contracted to publicly state the Intel on the German raid. I'm just sick of the roller-coaster of hope, anticipation, and lies.
That sounds reasonable. The anon community give an ear to the general because it’s highly unlikely he’d would have made the rank of general and be a flake too. I gather this knowledge from my own military experience. Yeah, there are generals like Dumb Dog Mattis who support the Commie take over, but they don’t do it because they’re a flake they mainly do it because they’re corrupt, they see big paydays ahead and some see more power.
Yeah there’s more guys like Mattis than people realize. That’s my big point of caution about trusting ex military just because they are military.
But I mean a lot of people put faith in McInerney so maybe I should be a little more open minded. You know, this is just a crazy little theory I might have… But it’s possible… Just possible… I know it’s crazy… Please bear with me here…
That I don’t know everything.
Get up, get up off the floor, don’t think. Please. It’s OK, I know I know, I know, be still, be calm. I know. I know how crazy that is. Please stop crying. But it is possible that I’m not even half as smart as I think I am. I know! Please! Stop crying! It’s OK man. It’s OK to doubt me. It’s OK. Seriously. You’re gonna have to let go of this hero worship.
I’m not perfect!
There’s a small tiny outside possibility that there are some things in the universe that I am not certain of.
It is unpossible for random people on the internet to admit that they don't know everything. How dare you.
;-)
It’s one of those things you have to go with your gut feeling. I only put my faith in God and scripture. When it comes to believing people I determine them by the person, my common sense, any ability I may have to help decent truth, but then I’m still somewhat a skeptic. I learned a long time ago how it feels to get blindsided from hero warship.
(post is archived)