You need to understand anons have been continuously attacked by shills for years now. It creates pavlovian responses. Obviously not good. Desired effect? As for Q's legitimacy, think about this. The anti-Q official position is a global awakening of people to how the world is really run (all confirmed at this point) is bad and will only ever pacify everyone. Ask yourself if you believe that logic holds water? That's rhetorical and for you to answer for yourself. Is it really so crazy to ask questions of the public and have them research topics and come to shared conclusions? The anti-Q people say yes, and can only pacify people. That's rhetorical and for you to answer for yourself. The information available strongly implies we would already be in WWIII had Hillary won. Who benefits from delaying and resisting? Us or our enemies? You sound rational to me. Trust yourself. I pray we won't find ourselves shoulder to shoulder in a foxhole. Thank again for the pleasant exchange.