Well I’ve said multiple times that my problem isn’t really with Q but with the people who follow and tell the rest of us what we’re supposed to believe by their orders. But you are open minded enough to understand that, most of these people are not.
And, hell, I’m not even anti-Q. I’m here because I want to still believe the way that I used to. I’m not sqying Q is or is not real, is or is not a fraud. We will find out I believe. Honestly, if Joe Biden is inaugurated and everything gets worse, then yes, I will believe that Q was a fraud or a joke or a prank or a cruel operation. It won’t actually matter what it is if it’s not real.
What bothers the living piss out of me is exactly what you described. There are some shitty Christians who do this too, and it reflects poorly on the word of God.
People see Christians lying and making things up and inventing doctrine to explain their own beliefs and reflects poorly on God when it shouldn’t. It makes the gospels look like a joke when it shouldn’t. You would think Q people would be more willing to listen. You would think they would have a shred of self-awareness to see how ridiculous they look when they make, literally, dozens of crazy statements a day and still demand obedience to their word.
Plus, half of the time that they take offense at what I say I’m fucking around with them and kidding. I’m trying to have a sense of humor about this. But a lot of Qtards really don’t have a sense of humor. Fuck, I’m dying and I make fun of that all the time. You have to enjoy humor when you can get it.
You need to understand anons have been continuously attacked by shills for years now. It creates pavlovian responses. Obviously not good. Desired effect?
As for Q's legitimacy, think about this. The anti-Q official position is a global awakening of people to how the world is really run (all confirmed at this point) is bad and will only ever pacify everyone. Ask yourself if you believe that logic holds water? That's rhetorical and for you to answer for yourself.
Is it really so crazy to ask questions of the public and have them research topics and come to shared conclusions? The anti-Q people say yes, and can only pacify people. That's rhetorical and for you to answer for yourself.
The information available strongly implies we would already be in WWIII had Hillary won. Who benefits from delaying and resisting? Us or our enemies?
You sound rational to me. Trust yourself.
I pray we won't find ourselves shoulder to shoulder in a foxhole. Thank again for the pleasant exchange.
(post is archived)