Thank you for a real answer.
Raises even more questions but I will read it more than a few times.
Thank you.
This is high stakes, regardless of your beliefs. Psychological warfare is rampant.
I understand. And hopefully people see that some of us have legitimate doubts and questions that don’t arise from a lack of desire to see results.
Rather, since I don’t know any of these people personally, I see their constantly changing process as confusing.
The process through which they believe they can explain where the results will come from. But then I see them changing the process every time the results fail to produce.
In other words, I see people moving goal posts and then claiming they never move goal posts. I see them telling me what’s going to happen on, let’s say, November 1, and then when that fails to produce they don’t change their process at all, the process to produce the bad intelligence. They told me something was going to happen. They volunteered it. I didn’t ask them. They volunteered it. It didn’t happen. Then they get mad at me for not believing in the next day when they tell me something else is going to happen. You don’t see why that’s frustrating, confusing and even downright suspicious?
If I’m trying to make a living picking football games and I’m never right, why would anyone still subscribe to my service? And for me to get mad at other people for not believing me even though I’m right 10% of the time? Come on man. We’ve got people here who demand to be believed. Demand, literally demand then if you don’t believe them you are a communist. And they’re never right. They are never right. That’s some straight up bullshit.
I believe your assessment and argument is accurate. I too feel it. It sucks. That's psychological warfare.
But note the difference in our exchange vs what you describe. True anons use the socratic method (look it up if you need to). The entire purpose is for you to reach your own conclusions. This definately has a psychological factor in that it bypasses your own intellectual biases and filters.
Part of what you describe is known as datefagging. Commonly pushed by useful idiots and shills to delegitimize Q. Also the same for the Qclock.
This is why following the Q posts is so helpful. As it allows you to discern what Q said vs a well meaning anon vs a useful idiot vs a shill. Half the crap against Q was never stated by Q. Likely started by shills.
Q straight up said this has never been tried before. Which means failure is always on the table.
Trust yourself. Ask questions. Most importantly, try to prove yourself wrong.
(post is archived)