WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

153

They are references to the US Dept. of Defense Law of War.

See page 754, Article Xl Military Occupation

11.3 11.4 11.6

They outline and discuss POTUS authority for the occupation of the District of Columbia

Page 755, footnote 5: 3 kinds of military jurisdiction including insurrection in a state, territory or district

Page 767, footnote 74, no legal notice of occupation necessary

I can't copy link from reference, will try to update but the info is searchable. All this copied from another site, not my research.

They are references to the US Dept. of Defense Law of War. See page 754, Article Xl Military Occupation 11.3 11.4 11.6 They outline and discuss POTUS authority for the occupation of the District of Columbia Page 755, footnote 5: 3 kinds of military jurisdiction including insurrection in a state, territory or district Page 767, footnote 74, no legal notice of occupation necessary I can't copy link from reference, will try to update but the info is searchable. All this copied from another site, not my research.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Isn't the District of Columbia a corporation owned by Britain and or the Vatican. This would nix Posse Comitatus.