Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

335

They are references to the US Dept. of Defense Law of War.

See page 754, Article Xl Military Occupation

11.3 11.4 11.6

They outline and discuss POTUS authority for the occupation of the District of Columbia

Page 755, footnote 5: 3 kinds of military jurisdiction including insurrection in a state, territory or district

Page 767, footnote 74, no legal notice of occupation necessary

I can't copy link from reference, will try to update but the info is searchable. All this copied from another site, not my research.

They are references to the US Dept. of Defense Law of War. See page 754, Article Xl Military Occupation 11.3 11.4 11.6 They outline and discuss POTUS authority for the occupation of the District of Columbia Page 755, footnote 5: 3 kinds of military jurisdiction including insurrection in a state, territory or district Page 767, footnote 74, no legal notice of occupation necessary I can't copy link from reference, will try to update but the info is searchable. All this copied from another site, not my research.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (56).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Some of us are smart enough to understand the "riddles that blow you away". Flies right over your head huh??

[–] • 0 pt

Or the much more likely explanation: the prophecies are bullshit and your engaging in mental gymnastics.

Assange is a hero. He gave us information and evidence. Q easily could have done the same.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I am not wasting my time on you. Feeble minded nerds are a joke to normal people, too bad your not normal. Later argue with yourself.

[–] • 1 pt

So, when Donald trump isn’t occupying DC by force in two days, are you still going to call this guy feeble minded?