h-h-here we go again. Let's start off with the shaming language quote spam: >circle-jerking >fantasies >online horoscopes >delusions >drooling >worshiping his every fart >Qtards Now let's move on to falsehoods: >no risk of association It is a group calling for the prosecution of traitors under military law, which as the president he is the sole person who could authorize something of this scale. I would wager the first people who heard of this idea called it seditious conspiracy and immediately nuked whoever brought it to them from their life. Because indeed labeling someone a traitor does not justify any action, you must prove it lest you be accused of sedition. All of the language of Q is more inciteful than anything POTUS said on 1/6/2021 >never acknowledged or associated himself with it. He signs it, he has synced up his tweets to include extremely specific typos, he threw out a "tippy toppy" which made no sense in context. There absolutely is risk associated with doing this for the reason stated above. >disavowed you There is no speech you can point to that says this. >Not Kyle Rittenhouse The president can't pardon state crimes. >Not any of the many patriots who have been persecuted for defending themselves and the country during the 2020 negro race riots The president can't pardon state crimes. >Just his friends. That's hyperbole. As is "hundreds of criminals" as of Dec 23 2020 the number was 93, and tomorrow the number will still be under 200. I really hoped you could have done better.