![Q is a pacification OP? No. HOPELESSNESS is the real pacification OP. [861x1280 - 152KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/8ebpdR.jpg){kind=link}
If Q is for placating people - what did those who didn't follow Q do differently? Did it get a different result?
Nothing can be achieved without numbers. There are few of us, and many of you.
Which is why it is so frustrating to see you all circle-jerking over fantasies, allowing some online horoscopes to convince you that, any moment now, everything will fix itself, and all you need to do is sit back and "enjoy the show". We wouldn't care about your delusions if we didn't need you to stop drooling over "q drops" long enough to help us get things done.
If Q was not affiliated, would POTUS make a statement saying so to mitigate risks of association?
No. There is no risk of association, because he never acknowledged or associated himself with it. By ignoring it, he gets your rabid and unconditional support for free. Why would he make a statement that would ruin that, and make you stop worshiping his every fart as a sign of the "coming storm"?
He disavowed and threw you under the bus mighty quick when the Capitol incident made him look bad. He's pardoned and commuted hundreds of criminals. But not the people who were at the Capitol. Not Kyle Rittenhouse. Not any of the many patriots who have been persecuted for defending themselves and the country during the 2020 negro race riots. No help for any of them. Just for his friends. Those he thinks might be useful to him.
If Q was not affiliated, would POTUS, his fam, and his campaign team - would they all avoid using phrases like calm before the storm and anon requested phrases such as tippy toppy?
No. Same as above. No risk of association, because it's too vague and circumstantial. So only Qtards will pick up on it. So there's no harm in dropping those phrases. By throwing you those morsels now and then they reinforce your unconditional, religious support for them. For free.
What they can never answer is:
Answered. Now what?
Now we bask in your beaming pride in your own retardation and laugh.
h-h-here we go again.
Let's start off with the shaming language quote spam:
circle-jerking
fantasies
online horoscopes
delusions
drooling
worshiping his every fart
Qtards
Now let's move on to falsehoods:
no risk of association
It is a group calling for the prosecution of traitors under military law, which as the president he is the sole person who could authorize something of this scale. I would wager the first people who heard of this idea called it seditious conspiracy and immediately nuked whoever brought it to them from their life. Because indeed labeling someone a traitor does not justify any action, you must prove it lest you be accused of sedition. All of the language of Q is more inciteful than anything POTUS said on 1/6/2021
never acknowledged or associated himself with it.
He signs it, he has synced up his tweets to include extremely specific typos, he threw out a "tippy toppy" which made no sense in context. There absolutely is risk associated with doing this for the reason stated above.
disavowed you
There is no speech you can point to that says this.
Not Kyle Rittenhouse
The president can't pardon state crimes.
Not any of the many patriots who have been persecuted for defending themselves and the country during the 2020 negro race riots
The president can't pardon state crimes.
Just his friends.
That's hyperbole. As is "hundreds of criminals" as of Dec 23 2020 the number was 93, and tomorrow the number will still be under 200.
I really hoped you could have done better.
(post is archived)