![Q is a pacification OP? No. HOPELESSNESS is the real pacification OP. [861x1280 - 152KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/8ebpdR.jpg){kind=link}
What they can never answer is:
If Q is for placating people - what did those who didn't follow Q do differently? Did it get a different result?
If Q was not affiliated, would POTUS make a statement saying so to mitigate risks of association?
If Q was not affiliated, would POTUS, his fam, and his campaign team - would they all avoid using phrases like calm before the storm and anon requested phrases such as tippy toppy?
The shills are too easily defeated with simple questions.
Without a doubt, those attacking Q are part of a psyop.
The anti-Q narative is officially fighting against the Great Awakening. Making sure no one awakens. They claim awakening the world is all part of the evil plan to ensure no one fights. Therefore, by making everyone angry at reality, it therefore is placating and making everyone passive. You literally have to be retarded to follow their logic. But they back it with demoarlization propaganda. Which is designed to terminate thought.
Q is such a LARP, tens of thousands of people, every single day, across all social media, do nothing but attack and undermine Q and anons. Their preferred tactic is the judeo-Communist demoralization and projection (textbook Rule for Radicals; accuse your enemy of what you do).
If they were really on the side of The People, they would spend all their time attempting to build bridges. But the only plan they push is, go become a terrorist so all sides destroy you and it can be used against everyone else. When this is pointed out, they always say the plan is to unify everyone, but not unify everyone like Trump/Q/anons have done. Then they can't cite a single occurance where they actually attempt to unify anyone. Then they say they want unity, but only if you're a tiny subset which is already marginalized before all this shit started. Which literally means they don't want anyone unified.
No and this is the stuff they look at that “proves” to them that they are right that we are crazy. You really think everyone that criticizes something they don’t understand is part of a psychological operation? Yikes. This was the stuff that kept me away for years until I understood it better. And then every time I see it again it makes me cringe. It comes across as really melodramatic.
If you had a legitimate point you wouldn't need to lie by strawmanning and distorting what I said.
If Q is for placating people - what did those who didn't follow Q do differently? Did it get a different result?
Nothing can be achieved without numbers. There are few of us, and many of you.
Which is why it is so frustrating to see you all circle-jerking over fantasies, allowing some online horoscopes to convince you that, any moment now, everything will fix itself, and all you need to do is sit back and "enjoy the show". We wouldn't care about your delusions if we didn't need you to stop drooling over "q drops" long enough to help us get things done.
If Q was not affiliated, would POTUS make a statement saying so to mitigate risks of association?
No. There is no risk of association, because he never acknowledged or associated himself with it. By ignoring it, he gets your rabid and unconditional support for free. Why would he make a statement that would ruin that, and make you stop worshiping his every fart as a sign of the "coming storm"?
He disavowed and threw you under the bus mighty quick when the Capitol incident made him look bad. He's pardoned and commuted hundreds of criminals. But not the people who were at the Capitol. Not Kyle Rittenhouse. Not any of the many patriots who have been persecuted for defending themselves and the country during the 2020 negro race riots. No help for any of them. Just for his friends. Those he thinks might be useful to him.
If Q was not affiliated, would POTUS, his fam, and his campaign team - would they all avoid using phrases like calm before the storm and anon requested phrases such as tippy toppy?
No. Same as above. No risk of association, because it's too vague and circumstantial. So only Qtards will pick up on it. So there's no harm in dropping those phrases. By throwing you those morsels now and then they reinforce your unconditional, religious support for them. For free.
What they can never answer is:
Answered. Now what?
Now we bask in your beaming pride in your own retardation and laugh.
h-h-here we go again.
Let's start off with the shaming language quote spam:
circle-jerking
fantasies
online horoscopes
delusions
drooling
worshiping his every fart
Qtards
Now let's move on to falsehoods:
no risk of association
It is a group calling for the prosecution of traitors under military law, which as the president he is the sole person who could authorize something of this scale. I would wager the first people who heard of this idea called it seditious conspiracy and immediately nuked whoever brought it to them from their life. Because indeed labeling someone a traitor does not justify any action, you must prove it lest you be accused of sedition. All of the language of Q is more inciteful than anything POTUS said on 1/6/2021
never acknowledged or associated himself with it.
He signs it, he has synced up his tweets to include extremely specific typos, he threw out a "tippy toppy" which made no sense in context. There absolutely is risk associated with doing this for the reason stated above.
disavowed you
There is no speech you can point to that says this.
Not Kyle Rittenhouse
The president can't pardon state crimes.
Not any of the many patriots who have been persecuted for defending themselves and the country during the 2020 negro race riots
The president can't pardon state crimes.
Just his friends.
That's hyperbole. As is "hundreds of criminals" as of Dec 23 2020 the number was 93, and tomorrow the number will still be under 200.
I really hoped you could have done better.
Your questions don't make any sense. Rather than addressing what unbelievers are saying, you are asking irrelevant questions and any unsatisfactory answers will just go towards supporting your delusion. It's quite literally like asking "well,if my wife truly is cheating on my with my neighbour, how come there aren't any neighbours in my room???""" check mate shiillsss!. Your logic is literally broken by this cognitive dissonnance.
>If Q is for placating people - what did those who didn't follow Q do differently? Did it get a different result?>>
Quite literally what they were doing before you tainted any resistance to Trump with as being "pedo shills!!!". The majority of people on earth do not believe your delusion and so they have been trying to resist using whaever means they have, such as the legal system, focused protests and activism. Other are trying to survive and not lose their jobs and families over "muh proofs". Q is not the cuas of people finding out abou the pedos, Q is the cause of theose people being discredited.
>If Q was not affiliated, would POTUS make a statement saying so to mitigate risks of association?>>
This is stupid, you aare using proof of Trump distancing himself from Qtards as proof that Trump is connected to Qards. There's that cognitive dissonance again. Trump clearly distances himself from Q and you see that as proof that he is supporting Q. Trump clearly distanced himself form the people that stormed the Capitol, is that proof that he supports them? You make no fucking sense.
>If Q was not affiliated, would POTUS, his fam, and his campaign team - would they all avoid using phrases like calm before the storm and anon requested phrases such as tippy toppy?>>
Because that's literally all it took for you to drop any criticism of anything he did. LIsten to yourself.
You're retarded - keep going!
(post is archived)