Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

319

IS IT POSSIBLE THERE WILL BE TWO PRESIDENTS - FOR A SHORT TIME?

The original American Constitution was replaced in 1871 by the Act of 1871. This Act transformed America from a constitutional republic into a corporation controlled by bankers. The specific area of America that was turned into a corporation was DC. This act, and the subsequent rule over America from DC, had no constitutional authority, making it illegal and unenforceable. Ever since 1871, Americans have been living in an illusion called democracy - it's all a political game of deception.

(The Act of 1871: The “United States” Is a Corporation – There are Two Constitutions

http://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/)

President Trump has stated, many times, that he was returning American back to a Constitutional republic controlled by the people for the people - meaning he was rejecting the Act of 1871. All that has transpired through the election until now has set the ground for returning America back to the original Constitution. This means that when Bide is "inaugurated" of the 20th of Jan, he will become President of the DC corporation. In the tradition of the original Constitution, and under the authority of the original Constitution, President Trump will be inaugurated on the 4th of March. Thus there will be two Presidents. Remember Pelosi said they would have to drag Trump out of the WH? She knew this was coming. That's why she wants Trump impeached - removed from office. This would avoid the two Presidents scenario.

Prior to the passage of the Twentieth Amendment in the early 1930s, Inauguration Day was always March 4, the anniversary of the Constitution first taking affect in 1789. https://historyinpieces.com/research/presidential-inauguration-dates

IS IT POSSIBLE THERE WILL BE TWO PRESIDENTS - FOR A SHORT TIME? The original American Constitution was replaced in 1871 by the Act of 1871. This Act transformed America from a constitutional republic into a corporation controlled by bankers. The specific area of America that was turned into a corporation was DC. This act, and the subsequent rule over America from DC, had no constitutional authority, making it illegal and unenforceable. Ever since 1871, Americans have been living in an illusion called democracy - it's all a political game of deception. (The Act of 1871: The “United States” Is a Corporation – There are Two Constitutions http://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/) President Trump has stated, many times, that he was returning American back to a Constitutional republic controlled by the people for the people - meaning he was rejecting the Act of 1871. All that has transpired through the election until now has set the ground for returning America back to the original Constitution. This means that when Bide is "inaugurated" of the 20th of Jan, he will become President of the DC corporation. In the tradition of the original Constitution, and under the authority of the original Constitution, President Trump will be inaugurated on the 4th of March. Thus there will be two Presidents. Remember Pelosi said they would have to drag Trump out of the WH? She knew this was coming. That's why she wants Trump impeached - removed from office. This would avoid the two Presidents scenario. ------------ Prior to the passage of the Twentieth Amendment in the early 1930s, Inauguration Day was always March 4, the anniversary of the Constitution first taking affect in 1789. https://historyinpieces.com/research/presidential-inauguration-dates

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (34).
[–] • 0 pt

It seems strange that in 2016 they enact this law while at that time the Logan Act had never been used. They seem to anticipate events.

[–] • 1 pt

If you check this Atlantic Article its Headline states ITS OFFICIAL AMERICA HAS 2 PRESIDENTS AT THE SAME TIME

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/12/trump-obama-israel-settlements-security-council/511637/

What happens when the most powerful country in the world effectively has two presidents at once? Its policy regarding one of the most complex conflicts on the planet collapses into a muddled mess.

Or, more precisely, you have what unfolded over the last 48 hours: The Egyptian government submits to the UN Security Council a resolution against Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. This raises the possibility that the Obama administration could express its opposition to Israeli settlement policy by abstaining from the vote, rather than vetoing the resolution as it had with a similar one in 2011. Enraged Israeli officials call up Donald Trump, who tweets that the United States should veto. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the president of Egypt, abruptly calls off the vote. At some point during all this, Trump has a phone conversation with Sisi where they chat about jointly solving various issues in the Middle East. Anonymous Israeli officials, essentially siding with the incoming Trump administration, criticize Obama in unusually harsh terms for plotting with the Palestinians to abandon Israel at the United Nations. A day later, Malaysia, New Zealand, Senegal, and Venezuela reintroduce the resolution, which comes to a vote and is adopted by the Security Council, including Egypt, with the United States abstaining. Barack Obama delivers a powerful parting message to Israel’s leaders that is powerfully undercut by Donald Trump’s opening message. “As to the U.N., things will be different after Jan. 20th,” Trump tweets shortly after the vote.

Still with me?

Transitions of power are always awkward, uncertain moments in the life of a nation and its relations with the world. Richard Nixon’s campaign aides, for example, allegedly interfered with Vietnam War peace talks organized by Lyndon Johnson. But Donald Trump has involved himself in international affairs like no U.S. president-elect in recent memory.

[–] • 0 pt

Definitely logistical and political problems with two presidents and the transition...1871 lays the foundation for legally changing the very nature of the Presidency from CEO to election leader. It is sure to be messy as the Atlantic article points out...but there is a clear legal, historical pathway to presidential legitimacy. Great post!