Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

876

https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/6d274110-a84b-4694-96cd-6a902207d2bd/note/733364cf-0afb-412d-a5b4-ab797a8ba154.#page=1

"Additonally, the Ombudsman found that CIA Management took actions "pressuring [analysts] to withdraw their support" from the alternative viewpoint on China "in an attempt to suppress it." (p.2)

Not good for the CIA

https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/6d274110-a84b-4694-96cd-6a902207d2bd/note/733364cf-0afb-412d-a5b4-ab797a8ba154.#page=1 "Additonally, the Ombudsman found that CIA Management took actions "pressuring [analysts] to withdraw their support" from the alternative viewpoint on China "in an attempt to suppress it." (p.2) Not good for the CIA

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (8).
[–] • 0 pt

That was a short read, it basically says China sought to interfere with US elections and the CIA put pressure on its own analysts to down play the risk assessment of Chinese involvement.

I love all the little drips we are getting but "WE" know more details about how and through whom China rigged this election than what is being officially released.