Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

I don't know why evidence of the electronic vote flipping is left out, nor why the focus seems on proving sufficient election fraud COULD have occurred to change results (amount of proven fraud many times larger than margins, which is different than proving the result is wrong) rather than such-and-such dumps are fraudulent and must be subtracted, thus proving Trump DID win.

May have some useful stuff for sharing but I do think it could have been way more strongly presented.

Btw, if it is not new, then I over-relied on GayWay saying it is, which is where I saw this. For sure I've seen various of the data tables before.

I don't know why evidence of the electronic vote flipping is left out, nor why the focus seems on proving sufficient election fraud COULD have occurred to change results (amount of proven fraud many times larger than margins, which is different than proving the result is wrong) rather than such-and-such dumps are fraudulent and must be subtracted, thus proving Trump DID win. May have some useful stuff for sharing but I do think it could have been way more strongly presented. Btw, if it is not new, then I over-relied on GayWay saying it is, which is where I saw this. For sure I've seen various of the data tables before.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

There is no mention of problems with computers, systems or vote flipping . . . . there is not even a discussion about databases. BIG omission imo If I didn't know better I would think the author wants the focus to be on everything EXCEPT the primary source of the problem: digital vote processing. This pisses me off. Isn't ANYONE objective . . . does every report need to have an agenda attached. grrrrrrr