I wonder if Crensch will think you need to provide evidence to support your claim.
Of course he won't.
Instead, your assertion is automatically to be taken as true or good opinion, because, nice narrative! And that's how "truth" is determined by him and you.
He won't ask you for evidence but I will.
Sauce? For either part?
EDIT: Still waiting for trace of evidence. You can downvote but you can't come up with even one little trace of actual evidence the country had been "USA Inc" (Inc means a corporation) or of a recent change in such? I don't mean people asserting it themselves but also without evidence. Not one little bit?
It does not help our movement to make evidence-free claims such as the United States had been a corporation supposedly until now, supposedly, with the evidence-free alleged change supposedly being important. Have a fact. Is that too much to ask? To you downvoters, yes it is. Nice narrative is all that matters, right? No, truth matters. Have evidence for it. (I know, too much to ask of those who care only if a narrative sounds cool.)
If you've been paying attention to Trump's activities over the past four years, you'd already have a lot of the evidence that this is being implemented.
I'm asking just for one tiny piece of actual evidence, not merely people asserting it but giving no evidence, of the "USA Corporation" being the actual US government the last 100 plus years.
The purportedly relevant legislation does not say any such thing.
If you've been paying attention surely you have actual evidence? One teensy piece at least?
No you do not. And you've paid no attention to the fact that you do not. You just bought into an appealing-sounding narrative.
Note: Below this person of course fails to show where the act says as he claims and resorts to insult.
Further: Still has nothing. Now resorting to hostility. Of course.
(post is archived)