WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

173

I've heard talk that the United States Corporation has been quietly dissolved. Would it not then follow that if Joseph Biden is inaugurated as President of a defunct corporate entity then he would be President of nothing?

I've heard talk that the United States Corporation has been quietly dissolved. Would it not then follow that if Joseph Biden is inaugurated as President of a defunct corporate entity then he would be President of nothing?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

What a hypocrite.

:"If you have the claim, support it."

OP made the claim, I asked him to support it, he can't, but you don't apply that to him or yourself.

I'm not going to go back and forth with you as I take it you simply believe whatever fits your narrative, with utter lack of evidence no problem for you, and evidence contradicting what you like to believe being no problem for you either, simply something to ignore or mouth off stupidly on as you did above. This is posted for others, not for you, as your MO clearly has got nothing to do with facts. I've seen this from you many times.

[–] 1 pt

You didn't simply reject his claim and ask him to support it. You made your own claims.

I don't see how this simple concept isn't getting through to you.

You made actual claims. Positive claims. Meaning you took the burden of proof upon yourself.

You didn't ask him for a source on the shadow government. You didn't ask him to support his implied claim. You made your own claim. You even gave a hint steeped in thinly veiled contempt for that user.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Go ask the OP to support his claim, if you are no hypocrite.

Go read all legislation purported to be related to this. Which isn't much. There's your evidence.

Do you need me to read it to you out loud?

His assumption is evidence-free.

In case you didn't know, one cannot demand of a person to prove a negative. His claim is the postive one, that the form of US government changed to the form he said. He gave no evidence, he has none. Neither do you.

You will prove yourself either having a trace of intellectual honesty or none according to your reply.

[–] 1 pt

Since you're too stupid to understand, and too busy acting like you are smarter than everyone else, I'll explain it to you in really simple terms.

Your comment started out as if you were simply asking for the user to support their implied claim of a shadow government. That was a good start. But you're real intense showed up with everything after that. You basically declared that there was no Shadow government and that they were stupid for believing it and that they needed to do a lot more research. It is not their job to prove you right. It is your job to prove yourself right. It's not my fault you fucked up, and it's not my fault you're too stupid to not realize that you fucked up.

And since you're too stupid understand that, and probably getting emotional about being called stupid when some part of you realizes I'm correct, let me put this a different way for your feeble mind:

The Holocaust narrative supports itself by pointing to the Nuremberg trials rather often. The Nuremberg trials were a complete hoax. Now go do research at that time. And you'll see that I'm correct.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I'm not the one that has a problem with the claim, you are.

There you are telling me to go do things when it's your job to prove your claim.

Your snark is going to bite you in the ass, because you're the one that looks stupid here, you're just too stupid to know it.

I didn't demand that you prove a negative. You made a positive claim.

Prove he has no evidence. That's another positive claim.

I really can't see how you're so stupid that you don't understand this.