Go ask the OP to support his claim, if you are no hypocrite.
Go read all legislation purported to be related to this. Which isn't much. There's your evidence.
Do you need me to read it to you out loud?
His assumption is evidence-free.
In case you didn't know, one cannot demand of a person to prove a negative. His claim is the postive one, that the form of US government changed to the form he said. He gave no evidence, he has none. Neither do you.
You will prove yourself either having a trace of intellectual honesty or none according to your reply.
Since you're too stupid to understand, and too busy acting like you are smarter than everyone else, I'll explain it to you in really simple terms.
Your comment started out as if you were simply asking for the user to support their implied claim of a shadow government. That was a good start. But you're real intense showed up with everything after that. You basically declared that there was no Shadow government and that they were stupid for believing it and that they needed to do a lot more research. It is not their job to prove you right. It is your job to prove yourself right. It's not my fault you fucked up, and it's not my fault you're too stupid to not realize that you fucked up.
And since you're too stupid understand that, and probably getting emotional about being called stupid when some part of you realizes I'm correct, let me put this a different way for your feeble mind:
The Holocaust narrative supports itself by pointing to the Nuremberg trials rather often. The Nuremberg trials were a complete hoax. Now go do research at that time. And you'll see that I'm correct.
@Trenace did you see what I did there? I did exactly what you did. Now you get to prove the Holocaust actually happened! Right?
Or are you a complete and utter fucking moron who had no right to talk down to that user and still hasn't apologized to him for being a complete dick?
You've shown me who you are. I need see no further.
Thanks for revealing your intellectual dishonesty, utter lack of care for need for evidence, utter lack of evidence, and your hypocrisy.
Goodbye. No further replies to your ilk. Replying to anyone having the above deficiencies, as you have, is an utter waste of time, once firmly established to be the case.
I'm not the one that has a problem with the claim, you are.
There you are telling me to go do things when it's your job to prove your claim.
Your snark is going to bite you in the ass, because you're the one that looks stupid here, you're just too stupid to know it.
I didn't demand that you prove a negative. You made a positive claim.
Prove he has no evidence. That's another positive claim.
I really can't see how you're so stupid that you don't understand this.
(post is archived)