How about first support that this "United States Corporation" is a real thing with evidences beyond just finding people that assert it without evidence, before going to the next step of "hearing talk" that that has been dissolved.
Hint, if you go to the actual legislation from 1871 etc it doesn't say what those people say it does.
If you like research, you have some research to do that's needed before wondering about what you've heard without evidence of this phantom, allegedly being "dissolved" recently, again with no evidence.
If you don't need evidence, then never mind, facts don't matter.
You are making the implicit claim that there is no Corporation of the United States and that there is no Shadow government, so other people should do lots of research. Why don't YOU do research and prove your claim?
Or maybe truth doesn't matter to you?
Really. You seriously think that when you claim a phantom for which you have no evidence besides people asserting it with no evidence, I am the one who needs to show you something?
If that is your actual thought process then you need help.
Since you failed to have any evidence for your assumption, and failed to realize that in that case you ought to go try to get some if there is any (there isn't), I will help your sauce-less self out. Try these two to start:
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
Try finding any law ever passed that actually has in it what your phantom theory claims. The generally cited supposed law is above, and does no such thing as replace the country's form of government as ignorantly or as purposeful info claimed by many, including assumed by you, without any evidence whatsoever.
I'm not going to go back and forth with you as I take it you simply believe whatever fits your narrative, with utter lack of evidence no problem for you, and evidence contradicting what you like to believe being no problem for you either, simply something to ignore or mouth off stupidly on as you did above. This is posted for others, not for you, as your MO clearly has got nothing to do with facts.
You made the claim. That's exactly how the burden of proof works.
If you think people are believing something stupid, it is your burden to prove them wrong.
If you think any differently, you're the one that needs help. It's argumentation 101. If you have the claim, you support it.
(post is archived)