How about what should be an easier task:
Showing actual proof with evidences -- I don't mean finding someone who asserts it's true -- that the "US Corporation" claims have any basis to them whatsoever beyond what the actual legislation reads, which doesn't remotely say what these people assert?
Why not have evidence for the theory in the first place before asking for evidence that that has been dissolved?
http://annavonreitz.com/actof1871.pdf
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
Hey! I heard that for decades there has been a secret American military base on the Moon. But now I've heard they've packed up and left. Anyone have any sauce on them closing the moon base?
That is an analogy, in case the point is missed. Best to be sure the first idea is evidenced before asking for evidence that a change has occurred.
Please feel free to provide actual evidence rather than just people making assertions. There's a lot of that out there on a lot of things. Some don't stand up.
A simple no would suffice
A simple "no" would not have gotten across that before asking if something has just been dissolved, you need to have evidence that it actually was in place rather than just people asserting it, and the OP has none.
(post is archived)