Kek
Kek
HA! Public skoolz failed us again...
HA! Public skoolz failed us again...
This lawyer is properly referred to as a ‘former employee’ because is is a ‘former employee’.
He is a ‘former employee’ because he was fired.
He was fired because of his hateful rhetoric.
His hateful rhetoric was exposed by a Project Veritas video.
I see no problem with the title.
This lawyer is properly referred to as a ‘former employee’ because is is a ‘former employee’.
He is a ‘former employee’ because he was fired.
He was fired because of his hateful rhetoric.
His hateful rhetoric was exposed by a Project Veritas video.
I see no problem with the title.
Fires a former employee? By definition, you can't do that.
Fires a former employee? By definition, you can't do that.
Reread line two of my comment.
The longest word is only 3 syllables.
Focus on comprehension.
Reread line two of my comment.
The longest word is only 3 syllables.
Focus on comprehension.
He's right bro. He would have had to be an employee at the time of firing. Refer to public skoolz comment. Disregard if you were home sculd.
He's right bro. He would have had to be an employee at the time of firing. Refer to public skoolz comment. Disregard if you were home sculd.
Focus on accuracy of the statement
;)
Focus on accuracy of the statement
;)
Fires former employee....
Hm......
Fires *former* employee....
Hm......
(post is archived)