Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Allegedly from his Parler account yesterday. (I don't frequent Parler, but I thought it was down yesterday).

"Dear Patriots, When Nancy Pelosi contacted the Joint Chiefs to request the nuclear codes be kept from me, it appears she committed a seditious act. Her attempts to interfere in my administration are a national security threat. We are looking at the various Federal crime statutes we will use to charge her. Some of the penalties include up to 20 years in prison and in some cases the death penalty. We also have evidence that she has connections to the Chinese Communist Party, which will lead to additional charges."

Allegedly from his Parler account yesterday. (I don't frequent Parler, but I thought it was down yesterday). >*"Dear Patriots, When Nancy Pelosi contacted the Joint Chiefs to request the nuclear codes be kept from me, it appears she committed a seditious act. Her attempts to interfere in my administration are a national security threat. We are looking at the various Federal crime statutes we will use to charge her. Some of the penalties include up to 20 years in prison and in some cases the death penalty. We also have evidence that she has connections to the Chinese Communist Party, which will lead to additional charges."*

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

I would guess it was a creation of Simon Parks. Be carefull with that guy.

[–] • 2 pts

Roger that. Only started listening to him a couple of weeks ago when he did a video with Charlie Ward (who I also know nothing about) and they seemed to be privy to inside information. Looks as though he has jumped the shark.

[–] • 2 pts

Agree!! Full assault of YouTube and social media and this guys channel is still up.... I smell disinformation. Remember guys “no outside Comms”.

[–] • 1 pt

What? It is my understanding that "no outside Comms" is in reference to Q drops, not Trump communications.

[–] • 1 pt

I was commenting on my opion of Simon Parks. Q doesn’t talk to internet cucks like Simon Parks who can’t even keep their office clean... no outside comms means he only communicates though the pol boards. Of 8kun.... but since code monkey is no longer a mod Q has been pretty quiet.

[–] • 0 pt

He was referring to that fact that Simon Parkes claims he has talked with Q for 1.5 hours a few days ago. I doubt that happened and makes Parkes suspect.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Parkes got a lot of new eyes on him this week but now people are catching on that he is in the same lot as Robert David Steele and Alex Jones. He is either intentionally putting out disinfo or someone is feeding it to him. Is this an attempt to keep people complacent with hopium until Biden is sworn in? Just wondering.

[–] • 1 pt

10 4. What about Charlie Ward, I don't know much about him either (saw him same time I saw Simon Parkes)... But I figure birds of a feather and all that...

"...until Biden is sworn in?"

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh my eyes!

[–] • 0 pt

Concur on Alex Jones and add David Wilcock to that list...

[–] • 2 pts

Parler was down all day yesterday.

[–] • 0 pt

Roger that. Thanks for the info.

[–] • 1 pt

Parler is down since Sunday midnight, so just more BS fake news to keep the Hopium withdrawals to a minimum and anons calm.

[–] • 1 pt

It says the account is @teamtrumpnews. I don’t think that’s supposed to be an official account anyway. He may just be showing what’s being said out there.

[–] • 0 pt

Thanks. This is why I ask shit here, more facts, less shills.

[–] • 1 pt

Doesn't sound like Trump.

Fake and gay.

[–] • 1 pt

Fake. The information in it is fairly accurate, but I doubt trump said/posted or thought anything like that to release to people.

[–] • 0 pt

Agreed. Doesn't pass the sniff test to me. Trump never posts specifics about Pelosi.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, my BS meter piqued. Thanks for the input.

[–] • 0 pt

This is sloppy (Simon Parkes' post). It's supposedly from Gab...

[–] • 0 pt

Okay, rather than argue if this is Trump or not.....is the info accurate? Was what she did considered a crime?

[–] • 1 pt

Since I am no constitutional lawyer, I can only speculate (like pretty much everything I've heard from everyone over the last 4 years), but interfering in the duties and presidential access of US military assets would seem to be sedition at the very least.

Then again, If you take my speculation on this matter and a few bucks you can buy a cup of coffee.

[–] • 0 pt

If it is BS, it would certainly put the nail in the coffin of Simon Parkes.

[+] [deleted] • 0 pt