WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

Purely out of my wanting to know as part of evaluating the guy -- right now I am viewing him as probably black-piller controlled oppo -- rather than trying to raise discussion on these, what have been a David Knight's stances on Q and on (semi-random choice for evaluation) chemtrails?

Thank you!

Purely out of my wanting to know as part of evaluating the guy -- right now I am viewing him as probably black-piller controlled oppo -- rather than trying to raise discussion on these, what have been a David Knight's stances on Q and on (semi-random choice for evaluation) chemtrails? Thank you!

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Sometimes you just have to decide for yourself and 'use discernment.' I used to listen to David Knight and quit. Not because I found anything dark about him. He is a pundit and I get tired of pundits. He has his views and his topics (he is adamantly opposed to 5G and did a lot on that). Personally, I don't really decide whether or not to listen to someone based on whether or not they 'support' Q. Value doesn't begin and end there. But I think your more intelligent commentators, like Rush, wouldn't touch Q with a foot pole--one way or another. They keep public and private personas separate. Most of Rush's audience, for example, would likely be very upset if Rush started pushing an unvetted source such as Q. So, for what its worth, David Knight considers his audience as well, as he must. Personally though--I have a bad taste in my mouth for anyone who worked for AJ. I originally listened to Jones because a friend of mine loved him. But i didn't listen for long.

Thank you, but I was asking what positions he expressed on these, not so much whether are merits to knowing what was asked.

Did you happen to notice his positions on these, whether or not it seems relevant to what I decide on him?