Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

588

Purely out of my wanting to know as part of evaluating the guy -- right now I am viewing him as probably black-piller controlled oppo -- rather than trying to raise discussion on these, what have been a David Knight's stances on Q and on (semi-random choice for evaluation) chemtrails?

Thank you!

Purely out of my wanting to know as part of evaluating the guy -- right now I am viewing him as probably black-piller controlled oppo -- rather than trying to raise discussion on these, what have been a David Knight's stances on Q and on (semi-random choice for evaluation) chemtrails? Thank you!

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

I think he's pretty based. Still doesn't name the jew. Got fired from infowars for disagreeing about Trump pushing vaccines and being part of the great reset. But even with that, I think he's controlled OP and was intended to fracture the infowars audience as most of them come to realize Trump isn't doing anything.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Thank you. Interesting observation particularly on dividing the InfoWars audience.

Have you or anyone noticed his positions on what I asked? I have had no luck in websearching to determine those and it would not be practical to view potentially hundreds of hours of videos to try to find that content by him, if there is any.

[–] • 1 pt

I want to say he generally agrees with the idea of that the UN is using cloud seeding for supposed environmental control. But dont quote me on that.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Thank you. A little different than what he says or does not say on chemtrails but related and useful to know.

[–] • 0 pt

Sometimes you just have to decide for yourself and 'use discernment.' I used to listen to David Knight and quit. Not because I found anything dark about him. He is a pundit and I get tired of pundits. He has his views and his topics (he is adamantly opposed to 5G and did a lot on that). Personally, I don't really decide whether or not to listen to someone based on whether or not they 'support' Q. Value doesn't begin and end there. But I think your more intelligent commentators, like Rush, wouldn't touch Q with a foot pole--one way or another. They keep public and private personas separate. Most of Rush's audience, for example, would likely be very upset if Rush started pushing an unvetted source such as Q. So, for what its worth, David Knight considers his audience as well, as he must. Personally though--I have a bad taste in my mouth for anyone who worked for AJ. I originally listened to Jones because a friend of mine loved him. But i didn't listen for long.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Thank you, but I was asking what positions he expressed on these, not so much whether are merits to knowing what was asked.

Did you happen to notice his positions on these, whether or not it seems relevant to what I decide on him?