How about it? Trump signs an Executive Order and abdigates power of the entire US Government to the Military. It goes to a Military Court where all of the evidence is presented and a decision is rendered.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (11).

[–] • 0 pt

I have every reason to believe Trump may have revoked the Banking Act of 1871. If that's true, it explains why the Fed is gobbling debt and there is panic everywhere.

link

[–] • 2 pts

What reason(s) if I may ask?

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

So if you look up the Banking Act of 1871 you'll find textbook approved fodder that says it's a simple Act. Keep digging and you'll find other things. Things like the District of Columbia’s status suddenly changes that year. Now remember the District of Columbia was established July 16, 1790. But when you keep digging you find curious things like the fact that it was District of Columbia (until 1871).

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a single new district corporation[13] governing the entire federal territory, called the District of Columbia, thus dissolving the three major political subdivisions of the District (Port of Georgetown, the City of Washington, and Washington County) and their governments.

The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotage — when the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title. Only conspiracy type websites point this out but if you go back and do the research, these words DO change and while it is slippery to get a handle on The Banking Act of 1871 it starts to become apparent that 1871 saw many big changes and there IS a act of 1871 though it doesn't specifically state it gives controlling interest to foreign names. https://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/

This is a long rabbit hole to go down but if you do I will say it explains A LOT. Another link https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/two-us-constitutions If you just give all of this a cursory glance then it looks like the Bank Act of 1871 was in Canada only. It is also CONSTANTLY thrown out as a conspiracy.

It explains why the USA so often followed the lead of England, most specifically invasion of IRAQ. I always found it so odd that England declared war three days BEFORE the USA. Ummm, why? Why the fuck would England care about 911? Supposedly we fought wars to get away from England. Anyway, 911 is another rabbit hole. Just pointing out that the Act of 1871 lays basis for the claim of a shadow government.

Okay, lets assume this is true, because a good portion is verifiable.

So over the past few years we've seen unprecedented economic growth. And I say unprecedented because COVID was meant to destroy this economy. So, 2018/19 sees incredible growth but it comes during trade wars with not just one but many countries. Trump muscles up and starts holding other countries accountable, he calls out "humanitarian spending" ie, dumping money into UN, NATO, etc. A President taking on CFR and trade wars is seeing real growth. You lived through all of that but here's a link for reference. https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/donald-trump-economic-success-prosperity-increasing/

So then we come to 2020. Over the summer Jerome Powell says growth will be slow. https://www.wltx.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/federal-reserve-chair-jerome-powell-slow-recovery-summer/507-5a22e0ff-9d56-43c9-8d14-cc8c0707300c

But growth is actually good. And that is partially because the FED is gobbling up debt in ways that is so unprecedented that the financial sector has been talking about this ALL YEAR. Below I am posting a list of rag sites, not because I think they are legit news sources, but only to illustrate that this is literally half of what the financial sector has been obsessing over all year.

https://schiffgold.com/key-gold-news/the-fed-now-holds-a-record-percentage-of-us-debt/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2020/10/09/the-new-scary-fed-steps-into-new-territory/?sh=31b76b784407 https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/fed-s-etf-purchases-have-changed-markets-forever/ar-BB1bhphN https://slate.com/business/2020/11/mnuchin-federal-reserves-cares-act-biden.html https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/in-pandemic-fed-showed-its-muscle-in-markets-still-matters/articleshow/80014217.cms

So, you get the picture. The FED is buying up debt and going into uncharted territory. They can't just walk down to Circle K and buy debt. The Fed can't just buy up debt period. It has to have a vehicle. They have to use what's called an SPV which is a "Special Purpose Vehicle.". BlackRock is the SVP. BlackRock is an Asset Management/Capital Group. So they tap BlackRock to do it. Here's the thing, BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard are CIA. Maybe no one else will say it but I will. Shell corp? Sure, Vanguard will do it. Slippery money? State Street will provide it. These capital asset groups are one of the biggest fucking rabbit holes you will ever go down. It never ends. They came on my radar in 2013 because under Obama massive funds and companies were filtered through these three. They print it in the financial times and fly money laundering right out in the open the exact same way they did HSBC and Comey. Because most people never even think to check up on it, it flies right in your face. But these three groups OWN half of the major businesses in this country. You heard that correctly. HALF. Now reference back to what I said about CIA. This isn't just about Corporate News Media being an outright cesspool. This is about HALF of the businesses in this country being owned and governed by an entity that we've all come to know as Outright Evil. They own 17.26 TRILLION in Market Capitalization. Okay, so let me digress a second. Remember that list of CEO's resigning that started after Trump took office. Reference that list with the companies owned by BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard and you'll start to see that the Q haters weren't doing their research. CEO's resigning matter if more than half of all businesses are owned and controlled by the CIA.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-24/fed-hires-blackrock-for-agency-cmbs-corporate-debt-programs https://ponderwall.com/index.php/2019/09/29/vanguard-blackrock-statestreet-america/ (This link shows how MUCH the big three own and control) https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/24/business/blackrock-vanguard-state-street-biden/index.html https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2020/11/30/group-aims-to-limit-power-of-blackrock-vanguard-state-street/

In all of that you have the President issuing an Executive Order on December 18, 2020 about the redemption of Savings Bonds. Literally no one wants people to redeem savings bonds. The market sells bonds at cheap for an influx of cash. It's a trick. Then they want people to hold onto to them so long that they forget or by the time they cash in, inflation has made them worth the same amount. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-promoting-redemption-savings-bonds/

And remember none of this really spikes the markets and none of this melts down the market like it did in 2007/2008/into 2009. In fact, this worked so well that Powell is applauded back in November for an amazing job. https://www.newsmax.com/finance/streettalk/stocks-fed-powell-wall-street/2020/11/06/id/995851/

Now remember when Trump nominated Judy Shelton to the Fed board? https://www.zerohedge.com/political/controversial-gold-advocate-advances-fed-appointment Don't worry, no one else does either. But, I do. Shelton is controversial because she is a huge proponent of the Gold Standard which is why she didn't get nominated before. FIVE DAYS ago Trump re-nominated her. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-renominates-judy-shelton-in-last-ditch-bid-to-reshape-fed/ar-BB1csUVP?ocid=uxbndlbing

Shelton is important because at the first nomination, rumblings of going back onto the gold standard started. Kinda odd, that he's re-nominating her now. I like her. I hope she is confirmed. . There is already more than $22 trillion in federal bond debt. The Federal Reserve is buying $625 billion per week, or $2.5 trilion per month! Some of that is NEW debt because of all the massive new spending, but the rest is buying other US debt (if they keep up that buying pace). Who exactly owns the federal debt? There are two types of federal debt: marketable securities and non-markelable securities. Non- marketable securities are just a paper game where the US gov't "borrows" from the left pocket to put into the right pocket.

What these SPV's might be is a one-two punch to take down the Federal Reserve, AND ... eliminate the income tax! As the FR prints money to fund the SPV's, which buy up corporate bonds and other non-gov't assets, the FR is also printing money to buy up US treasury debt. At $2.5 trillion in purchases per month, if the FR is buying the real debt and not the fake debt, then they will own ALL of the debt.

If they are also using that same money to fund the SPV's, then it will take longer still. But sooner or later, the FR will end up owning ALL OF THE DEBT -- either directly, or by issuing loans to the SPV's. Instead of everybody else being in debt to the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve will be in debt. And then ... Congress passes a law abolishing the Federal Reserve, and letting it die in bankruptcy court. Because at that point it is so riddled with debt that it is no longer a viable financial institution.

All of its transactions for the past however many years would be made available to the trustees and ultimately the public would learn what they have been doing with all that money over the years.

The US Treasury then takes over the printing presses, but backed by gold. Over time, and without interest-bearing money, the federal government could get back to its constitutional limitations. The gold standard loops us back around to Shelton. Odd that he's making a push for someone known to publicly state Central Banks aren't necessary and push the gold standard.

Then while I was typing all of this out for you without archived links which is going to bring out the archive link police in full force on Poal I found this curious piece of drivel. You don't have to read it because it is a Washington Post article that links these Acts of 1871 back to the KKK and white nationalists and some other such bullshit that is ridiculous. But here's the link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/01/08/1871-provides-roadmap-addressing-wednesdays-pro-trump-insurrection/

So, really why are the shills at Washington Shitpost trying to deface the act of 1871 and link it to white nationalism IF TRUMP isn't about to make that move. Because since when did anyone in Corporate News Media even think about 1871 before now.

That was a lot to take in but you asked and I hope it makes sense. I've been watching this from the financial sector for a while with a sharp eye. I don't know what all of this means exactly but it lines up with what I've been thinking.

So if you look up the Banking Act of 1871 you'll find textbook approved fodder that says it's a simple Act. Keep digging and you'll find other things. Things like the District of Columbia’s status suddenly changes that year. Now remember the District of Columbia was established July 16, 1790. But when you keep digging you find curious things like the fact that it was District of Columbia (until 1871). The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a single new district corporation[13] governing the entire federal territory, called the District of Columbia, thus dissolving the three major political subdivisions of the District (Port of Georgetown, the City of Washington, and Washington County) and their governments. The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin. With the Act of 1871, the organic Constitution was defaced — in effect vandalized and sabotage — when the title was capitalized and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title. Only conspiracy type websites point this out but if you go back and do the research, these words DO change and while it is slippery to get a handle on The Banking Act of 1871 it starts to become apparent that 1871 saw many big changes and there IS a act of 1871 though it doesn't specifically state it gives controlling interest to foreign names. https://www.federaljack.com/slavery-by-consent-the-united-states-corporation/ This is a long rabbit hole to go down but if you do I will say it explains A LOT. Another link https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/two-us-constitutions If you just give all of this a cursory glance then it looks like the Bank Act of 1871 was in Canada only. It is also CONSTANTLY thrown out as a conspiracy. It explains why the USA so often followed the lead of England, most specifically invasion of IRAQ. I always found it so odd that England declared war three days BEFORE the USA. Ummm, why? Why the fuck would England care about 911? Supposedly we fought wars to get away from England. Anyway, 911 is another rabbit hole. Just pointing out that the Act of 1871 lays basis for the claim of a shadow government. Okay, lets assume this is true, because a good portion is verifiable. So over the past few years we've seen unprecedented economic growth. And I say unprecedented because COVID was meant to destroy this economy. So, 2018/19 sees incredible growth but it comes during trade wars with not just one but many countries. Trump muscles up and starts holding other countries accountable, he calls out "humanitarian spending" ie, dumping money into UN, NATO, etc. A President taking on CFR and trade wars is seeing real growth. You lived through all of that but here's a link for reference. https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/donald-trump-economic-success-prosperity-increasing/ So then we come to 2020. Over the summer Jerome Powell says growth will be slow. https://www.wltx.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/federal-reserve-chair-jerome-powell-slow-recovery-summer/507-5a22e0ff-9d56-43c9-8d14-cc8c0707300c But growth is actually good. And that is partially because the FED is gobbling up debt in ways that is so unprecedented that the financial sector has been talking about this ALL YEAR. Below I am posting a list of rag sites, not because I think they are legit news sources, but only to illustrate that this is literally half of what the financial sector has been obsessing over all year. https://schiffgold.com/key-gold-news/the-fed-now-holds-a-record-percentage-of-us-debt/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2020/10/09/the-new-scary-fed-steps-into-new-territory/?sh=31b76b784407 https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/fed-s-etf-purchases-have-changed-markets-forever/ar-BB1bhphN https://slate.com/business/2020/11/mnuchin-federal-reserves-cares-act-biden.html https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/in-pandemic-fed-showed-its-muscle-in-markets-still-matters/articleshow/80014217.cms So, you get the picture. The FED is buying up debt and going into uncharted territory. They can't just walk down to Circle K and buy debt. The Fed can't just buy up debt period. It has to have a vehicle. They have to use what's called an SPV which is a "Special Purpose Vehicle.". BlackRock is the SVP. BlackRock is an Asset Management/Capital Group. So they tap BlackRock to do it. Here's the thing, BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard are CIA. Maybe no one else will say it but I will. Shell corp? Sure, Vanguard will do it. Slippery money? State Street will provide it. These capital asset groups are one of the biggest fucking rabbit holes you will ever go down. It never ends. They came on my radar in 2013 because under Obama massive funds and companies were filtered through these three. They print it in the financial times and fly money laundering right out in the open the exact same way they did HSBC and Comey. Because most people never even think to check up on it, it flies right in your face. But these three groups OWN half of the major businesses in this country. You heard that correctly. HALF. Now reference back to what I said about CIA. This isn't just about Corporate News Media being an outright cesspool. This is about HALF of the businesses in this country being owned and governed by an entity that we've all come to know as Outright Evil. They own 17.26 TRILLION in Market Capitalization. Okay, so let me digress a second. Remember that list of CEO's resigning that started after Trump took office. Reference that list with the companies owned by BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard and you'll start to see that the Q haters weren't doing their research. CEO's resigning matter if more than half of all businesses are owned and controlled by the CIA. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-24/fed-hires-blackrock-for-agency-cmbs-corporate-debt-programs https://ponderwall.com/index.php/2019/09/29/vanguard-blackrock-statestreet-america/ (This link shows how MUCH the big three own and control) https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/24/business/blackrock-vanguard-state-street-biden/index.html https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2020/11/30/group-aims-to-limit-power-of-blackrock-vanguard-state-street/ In all of that you have the President issuing an Executive Order on December 18, 2020 about the redemption of Savings Bonds. Literally no one wants people to redeem savings bonds. The market sells bonds at cheap for an influx of cash. It's a trick. Then they want people to hold onto to them so long that they forget or by the time they cash in, inflation has made them worth the same amount. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-promoting-redemption-savings-bonds/ And remember none of this really spikes the markets and none of this melts down the market like it did in 2007/2008/into 2009. In fact, this worked so well that Powell is applauded back in November for an amazing job. https://www.newsmax.com/finance/streettalk/stocks-fed-powell-wall-street/2020/11/06/id/995851/ Now remember when Trump nominated Judy Shelton to the Fed board? https://www.zerohedge.com/political/controversial-gold-advocate-advances-fed-appointment Don't worry, no one else does either. But, I do. Shelton is controversial because she is a huge proponent of the Gold Standard which is why she didn't get nominated before. FIVE DAYS ago Trump re-nominated her. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-renominates-judy-shelton-in-last-ditch-bid-to-reshape-fed/ar-BB1csUVP?ocid=uxbndlbing Shelton is important because at the first nomination, rumblings of going back onto the gold standard started. Kinda odd, that he's re-nominating her now. I like her. I hope she is confirmed. . There is already more than $22 trillion in federal bond debt. The Federal Reserve is buying $625 billion per week, or $2.5 trilion per month! Some of that is NEW debt because of all the massive new spending, but the rest is buying other US debt (if they keep up that buying pace). Who exactly owns the federal debt? There are two types of federal debt: marketable securities and non-markelable securities. Non- marketable securities are just a paper game where the US gov't "borrows" from the left pocket to put into the right pocket. What these SPV's might be is a one-two punch to take down the Federal Reserve, AND ... eliminate the income tax! As the FR prints money to fund the SPV's, which buy up corporate bonds and other non-gov't assets, the FR is also printing money to buy up US treasury debt. At $2.5 trillion in purchases per month, if the FR is buying the real debt and not the fake debt, then they will own ALL of the debt. If they are also using that same money to fund the SPV's, then it will take longer still. But sooner or later, the FR will end up owning ALL OF THE DEBT -- either directly, or by issuing loans to the SPV's. Instead of everybody else being in debt to the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve will be in debt. And then ... Congress passes a law abolishing the Federal Reserve, and letting it die in bankruptcy court. Because at that point it is so riddled with debt that it is no longer a viable financial institution. All of its transactions for the past however many years would be made available to the trustees and ultimately the public would learn what they have been doing with all that money over the years. The US Treasury then takes over the printing presses, but backed by gold. Over time, and without interest-bearing money, the federal government could get back to its constitutional limitations. The gold standard loops us back around to Shelton. Odd that he's making a push for someone known to publicly state Central Banks aren't necessary and push the gold standard. Then while I was typing all of this out for you without archived links which is going to bring out the archive link police in full force on Poal I found this curious piece of drivel. You don't have to read it because it is a Washington Post article that links these Acts of 1871 back to the KKK and white nationalists and some other such bullshit that is ridiculous. But here's the link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/01/08/1871-provides-roadmap-addressing-wednesdays-pro-trump-insurrection/ So, really why are the shills at Washington Shitpost trying to deface the act of 1871 and link it to white nationalism IF TRUMP isn't about to make that move. Because since when did anyone in Corporate News Media even think about 1871 before now. That was a lot to take in but you asked and I hope it makes sense. I've been watching this from the financial sector for a while with a sharp eye. I don't know what all of this means exactly but it lines up with what I've been thinking.

parent
link