Which 'side' is he implying paid him to be there. Dems are projecting the whole event onto Trump as the planner and assisting the protesters in gaining access to the Capitol. It's very likely that since he did NOT say who paid him that once he gains enough attention, he will say he was hired by Trumps side to disrupt the Capitol proceedings. Everyone's calling for him admit who paid him, don't be surprised if he was paid to LIE.
Which 'side' is he implying paid him to be there. Dems are projecting the whole event onto Trump as the planner and assisting the protesters in gaining access to the Capitol. It's very likely that since he did NOT say who paid him that once he gains enough attention, he will say he was hired by Trumps side to disrupt the Capitol proceedings. Everyone's calling for him admit who paid him, don't be surprised if he was paid to LIE.
He'll have to prove it if it's ever going to carry any weight.
Making claims only works up to a point. We haven't reached that point.
He'll have to prove it if it's ever going to carry any weight.
Making claims only works up to a point. We haven't reached that point.
(post is archived)