He's literally maling child trafficking claims against a supreme court justice ON TWITTER.
What happened to not broadcasting evidence out in the open so the enemy is able to counter it.
I'm pretty sure making charges against a supreme court justice is broadcast like a giant red flare.
And why just a tease when he could drop info - and why are you okay with just a tease?
What happened to not broadcasting evidence out in the open so the enemy is able to counter it.
Claims are different than evidence, and no, I don't think he should drop evidence.
and why are you okay with just a tease?
He should keep making claims until they file a defamation lawsuit and then let discovery work like it's supposed to. If they don't, the silence will be deafening. This isn't some crackpot lawyer, he has MAJOR wins for Richard Jewell and Nick Sandmann, they need to answer these claims. If Roberts (who is a supreme court justice) lets it go, then we know LLW was right. If Roberts sues and wins then LLW's voice will be removed from the noise and we'll get more signal. Either way it's a win for us.
If Roberts sues and wins then LLW's voice will be removed from the noise and we'll get more signal. Either way it's a win for us.
Interesting take.
I never said he was a crackpot lawyer, but this subject matter is a bit more serious than Sandmann's.
I never said he was a crackpot lawyer
Didn't imply you did.
but this subject matter is a bit more serious than Sandmann's.
It's defamation law, the charges are more serious but the legalities are the same. He knows what he's doing... or he's gone insane. Either way he's put HIS ass on the line and we'll know soon how that gamble paid off.
(post is archived)