WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

785

I suspect Ed buck sang like a stool pigeon.

I suspect Ed buck sang like a stool pigeon.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

You didn't answer my question.

But it appears that you don't understand how false identities, histories, etc. are created.

Who created this petition? Anybody could have, including Johnheretohelp.

What does it prove? Nothing.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Tell me who Johnnheretohelp is . He exposed Project looking Glass, and take a look at youtube removed his videos.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/SPjZRYDL0buo/

Redill78 has been credible in the past.

Project Pandora. what would ne need a pardon for, appears for violating State Secrets. which is something a UK Intel agent was hit with for leaking to a reporter, that Bush Jr were going to pass created Intel to justify the War in Iraq , this means Bush, Powell and David Cameron could b e charged with war crimes.

[–] 0 pt

What does he even need a pardon for?

[–] 0 pt

If it follows the pattern of other Whistleblowers, Violating the State Secrets Act.

[–] 0 pt

You didn't bother to answer any of my questions to help me understand what points you're trying to make throughout this dialogue. Maybe you can't and so are just avoiding them by throwing your own questions at me in response, destroying any ability to deal with one point at a time and instead hoping that a continual onslaught of questionable claims will somehow wear me out and force me to concede.

All of your claims, taken one by one, can be shown to be based on faulty logic.

You keep claiming that this guy is legitimate based on various things:

1) That a petition for his pardon was submitted to the White House.

2) That information often disappears and people are often shadow-banned.

3) That truth is being distorted.

4) That his testimony has lined up with other information.

5) That someone has claimed that the DS has gone after him.

6) That similar patterns to other cases proves his legitimacy.

7) That he exposed the rumored Project Looking Glass.

8) That he was interviewed by RedPill78.

9) That he was involved in the rumored Project Pandora.

Let me deal with each of these one at a time, to show you why they fail to prove anything.

1) Anyone can submit a pardon, including this guy or someone who buys into his story. It means nothing. A pardon requires that the person has committed a crime, and what that crimes was hasn't been spelled out.

2) I assume you said this in response to me pointing out that everything relating to this guy's claims about having the Epstein tapes has been scrubbed from the internet. He could have done this himself or had others do it for him.

3) My whole issue with this guy is that he might be attempting to distort information, so you point supports me.

4) The information he has used in his claims has always been available before he began talking about it. There is nothing that's he's ever said that has later proven he has inside knowledge. He has created a lot of rumors that have been picked up by others and spread as fact, based solely on what he said.

5) You haven't provided any detail as to whether or not this has been verified by a reliable source, and it's only based on his own claims.

6) You haven't detailed what those patterns are or how they might prove anything. People can make up stories that reflect known patterns in order to bolster the illusion of believability.

7) Project Looking Glass is an unfounded rumor. It stretches the imagination and such extraordinary claims require extraordionary proof.

8) RedPill78 is no better a reliable source than anyone. He runs a podcast and needs stories to draw his audience.

9) Project Pandora is another rumored secret government project. It's based on real technologies that have been around for many decades, but that this guy claims to have been involved in it or knows something about it means nothing.

You're building your belief that this guy is legitimate based on unverified amd unreliable pieces of information.

If he had the Epstein tapes and ran off to Russia with them, as he claimed early on, and if he isn't being silenced, shadow banned, etc. for the many other things he claims to know about, then how do you explain that?

The guy is an attention seeker. He thrives on fooling people by creating stories based on already circulating facts or rumors, and injects himself into the stories to draw attention to himself. He has never come forth with anything that would legitimize his claims and prove he has inside knowledge or sources.