What does he even need a pardon for?
If it follows the pattern of other Whistleblowers, Violating the State Secrets Act.
You didn't bother to answer any of my questions to help me understand what points you're trying to make throughout this dialogue. Maybe you can't and so are just avoiding them by throwing your own questions at me in response, destroying any ability to deal with one point at a time and instead hoping that a continual onslaught of questionable claims will somehow wear me out and force me to concede.
All of your claims, taken one by one, can be shown to be based on faulty logic.
You keep claiming that this guy is legitimate based on various things:
1) That a petition for his pardon was submitted to the White House.
2) That information often disappears and people are often shadow-banned.
3) That truth is being distorted.
4) That his testimony has lined up with other information.
5) That someone has claimed that the DS has gone after him.
6) That similar patterns to other cases proves his legitimacy.
7) That he exposed the rumored Project Looking Glass.
8) That he was interviewed by RedPill78.
9) That he was involved in the rumored Project Pandora.
Let me deal with each of these one at a time, to show you why they fail to prove anything.
1) Anyone can submit a pardon, including this guy or someone who buys into his story. It means nothing. A pardon requires that the person has committed a crime, and what that crimes was hasn't been spelled out.
2) I assume you said this in response to me pointing out that everything relating to this guy's claims about having the Epstein tapes has been scrubbed from the internet. He could have done this himself or had others do it for him.
3) My whole issue with this guy is that he might be attempting to distort information, so you point supports me.
4) The information he has used in his claims has always been available before he began talking about it. There is nothing that's he's ever said that has later proven he has inside knowledge. He has created a lot of rumors that have been picked up by others and spread as fact, based solely on what he said.
5) You haven't provided any detail as to whether or not this has been verified by a reliable source, and it's only based on his own claims.
6) You haven't detailed what those patterns are or how they might prove anything. People can make up stories that reflect known patterns in order to bolster the illusion of believability.
7) Project Looking Glass is an unfounded rumor. It stretches the imagination and such extraordinary claims require extraordionary proof.
8) RedPill78 is no better a reliable source than anyone. He runs a podcast and needs stories to draw his audience.
9) Project Pandora is another rumored secret government project. It's based on real technologies that have been around for many decades, but that this guy claims to have been involved in it or knows something about it means nothing.
You're building your belief that this guy is legitimate based on unverified amd unreliable pieces of information.
If he had the Epstein tapes and ran off to Russia with them, as he claimed early on, and if he isn't being silenced, shadow banned, etc. for the many other things he claims to know about, then how do you explain that?
The guy is an attention seeker. He thrives on fooling people by creating stories based on already circulating facts or rumors, and injects himself into the stories to draw attention to himself. He has never come forth with anything that would legitimize his claims and prove he has inside knowledge or sources.
Thank you for letting me know I am trying to wear you down to concede. because I had no idea until you informed me.
I sent you a interview to listen to and evaluate. and you are correct, some of the information he provided could be found, but he had more information, that I have found that is similar on other projects I came across. But when doing interviews it is more then the information I am looking for. I can not get into details , but there are many signs that can show deception. I had heard several interviews from the past, and had elapsed time frames. consistency was there. which left me the impression, at this time their are no signs of deception. Things that one looks for during interviews. Just like Slick Willy, I found several signs when he stated he did not have sex with that woman, he showed the signs, and I could laugh because I was watching it on TV and I even yelled BS. I knew from those signs he did. but this comes from experience conducting interviews. Right now he has shown no signs of deception in his interview, and provided a few more details that were not to be found in searches. that is interesting, is it BS it could be, but again no sign of deception noticed on that. so I was looking for more then a the story to make my impression on him. could it still be BS, it may, but right now it has nothing I could use to confront him to come clean. that is if it were BS.
Right now even you could not take it to court and prove he is full of crap either. And this is not a attack on you either. I love a honest discussion. But Horrowitz had a subject that was not released to us, titled Clinton crimes against children, for law Enforcement eyes only ??? Think about it, why was it for LE eyes only ? when it comes to Juveniles that laws are very strict. That does not mean he does not have anything, he by law can only allow LE , the Courts and Attys of record be allowed access to this information, and it is always sealed to protect the child or Juvenile as they refer to them. and there is your answer to why John wants to help can not release it to the public. Snowden ran to China and Russia, does not mean he did not have what he claimed either. Very easy for John to be charged with Child porn. and it is possible he already has handed it over.
Until I have more, he sounds credible. now feel free to share more then he is not credible. send me a interview please where he blew it. would love to hear it and see it. But thank you for telling me I build my belief based on unverified and unreliable information. what iIcan verify from what i have heard and seen, he has not shown what we would be looking for with deception. so it is based from reliable experience dealing with this in the past. That does not mean he gets a pass and I will continue to look . If he is a con then he is pretty good. But both of our opinions are opinions. I did explain why he could not release Epstein pedo correct ?
I was not diverting from answering, but thought you should listen and determine what you find in this audio. I did not want to inject my opinion as I respected the fact that you do think for yourself. and had hoped you would listen and share what you found. and we could compare notes, My opinions are based on experiences . and I want everyone to think for themselves also. I was not trying to force my opinion but allow you to listen to this interview and come to your own conclusion, if I wanted control I would not have used this tactic. I just wanted a fair assessment from you.
Redpill 78 I used only a few times as he came across on searched I was conducting, and the couple times i looked at things he shared and searched, he was on the money. has he changed and decided he like the attention, i have no idea, as I have not used him for a long time as my searched for answer led me elsewhere. Now I am not sure what your experiences are with him,. but the time I came across he was credible. and research proved him correct. so it appears you had a different experience. and may why we have a difference of opinion, yes some like the limelight and a6tention, I ignore that crap and just look to see if the information pans out. Because I want the facts, what they do is on them.
now listen to this, remove personnel and apply professional, be neutral, and please evaluate.
https://twitter.com/dontcha_know1/status/1343003190741135361
I apologize for getting back late, but Truck need to be washed and horses needed Hooves cut and filed evenly, makes me wish they were as easy as dog nails.
Hope I addressed your questions, but mine is to allow you to decide for yourself with the information provided. and I decide for myself.
(post is archived)