Thank you for letting me know I am trying to wear you down to concede. because I had no idea until you informed me.
I sent you a interview to listen to and evaluate. and you are correct, some of the information he provided could be found, but he had more information, that I have found that is similar on other projects I came across. But when doing interviews it is more then the information I am looking for. I can not get into details , but there are many signs that can show deception. I had heard several interviews from the past, and had elapsed time frames. consistency was there. which left me the impression, at this time their are no signs of deception. Things that one looks for during interviews. Just like Slick Willy, I found several signs when he stated he did not have sex with that woman, he showed the signs, and I could laugh because I was watching it on TV and I even yelled BS. I knew from those signs he did. but this comes from experience conducting interviews. Right now he has shown no signs of deception in his interview, and provided a few more details that were not to be found in searches. that is interesting, is it BS it could be, but again no sign of deception noticed on that. so I was looking for more then a the story to make my impression on him. could it still be BS, it may, but right now it has nothing I could use to confront him to come clean. that is if it were BS.
Right now even you could not take it to court and prove he is full of crap either. And this is not a attack on you either. I love a honest discussion. But Horrowitz had a subject that was not released to us, titled Clinton crimes against children, for law Enforcement eyes only ??? Think about it, why was it for LE eyes only ? when it comes to Juveniles that laws are very strict. That does not mean he does not have anything, he by law can only allow LE , the Courts and Attys of record be allowed access to this information, and it is always sealed to protect the child or Juvenile as they refer to them. and there is your answer to why John wants to help can not release it to the public. Snowden ran to China and Russia, does not mean he did not have what he claimed either. Very easy for John to be charged with Child porn. and it is possible he already has handed it over.
Until I have more, he sounds credible. now feel free to share more then he is not credible. send me a interview please where he blew it. would love to hear it and see it. But thank you for telling me I build my belief based on unverified and unreliable information. what iIcan verify from what i have heard and seen, he has not shown what we would be looking for with deception. so it is based from reliable experience dealing with this in the past. That does not mean he gets a pass and I will continue to look . If he is a con then he is pretty good. But both of our opinions are opinions. I did explain why he could not release Epstein pedo correct ?
I was not diverting from answering, but thought you should listen and determine what you find in this audio. I did not want to inject my opinion as I respected the fact that you do think for yourself. and had hoped you would listen and share what you found. and we could compare notes, My opinions are based on experiences . and I want everyone to think for themselves also. I was not trying to force my opinion but allow you to listen to this interview and come to your own conclusion, if I wanted control I would not have used this tactic. I just wanted a fair assessment from you.
Redpill 78 I used only a few times as he came across on searched I was conducting, and the couple times i looked at things he shared and searched, he was on the money. has he changed and decided he like the attention, i have no idea, as I have not used him for a long time as my searched for answer led me elsewhere. Now I am not sure what your experiences are with him,. but the time I came across he was credible. and research proved him correct. so it appears you had a different experience. and may why we have a difference of opinion, yes some like the limelight and a6tention, I ignore that crap and just look to see if the information pans out. Because I want the facts, what they do is on them.
now listen to this, remove personnel and apply professional, be neutral, and please evaluate.
https://twitter.com/dontcha_know1/status/1343003190741135361
I apologize for getting back late, but Truck need to be washed and horses needed Hooves cut and filed evenly, makes me wish they were as easy as dog nails.
Hope I addressed your questions, but mine is to allow you to decide for yourself with the information provided. and I decide for myself.
Do you know that Johnheretohlelp claimed that he sent copies of the terabytes of child porn he claimed to have to various friends around the world and expected them to release it all to the public if anything happened to him? Do you realize he would have been expecting these friends to commit a federal crime for possessing it, and for releasing it to the public? Do you realize he would have also been subjecting those children to unwanted exposure of their victimization? Why would he even have this child porn at all if he was a real whistleblower? Why wouldn't he have turned it over the whoever he contacted? He never contacted anybody, according to himself. You don't become a whistleblower by making claims in public. I think he realized his claims were full of holes and that's why he removed it all from the internet and hasn't spoken a word about it since. Instead he's moved on to making other claims.
I build my belief based on unverified and unreliable information.
I can't believe you said that! That's a good way to get caught up in lies. I do the opposite and I tend to end up being right in the end.
so it is based from reliable experience dealing with this in the past.
You think building your beliefs on unverified and unreliable information gives you reliable experience??? Wow.
but the time I came across he was credible. and research proved him correct.
What research?
yes some like the limelight and a6tention, I ignore that crap and just look to see if the information pans out.
So you have no idea that he could be working as counter intelligence for the Deep State, and was attempting to get in good with the Q movement and injecting his stories into the movement in order to lead them astray and eventually destroy their reputation and turn people away from them? Do you ever think about that when you research his or anyone else's claims? After all, you seem to be suggesting that you're experienced in this sort of thing.
Hope I addressed your questions
Not really. You're all over the place but saying nothing. You're not making any strong arguments in defense of your claims that Johnheretohelp is legitimate. You're rambling on about this and that and not being very clear at all what your point is, if you even have one. Perhaps you're just trying to waste my time trying to decipher that wall of text.
Conversation is over.
I build my belief based on unverified and unreliable information..
Really, while you ignore Rothsteins videos taken down, and claim there is no pattern ?? well there is and it has become common knowledge the internet is being scrubbed, and you fail to address this, Did Rothstein do the investigations back then or did Youtube ? Rothstein has been consistent. and the pattern is also there, that you failed to address, all these people have what Weiner called Insurance files. Did Julian Assange do the same with his files ?? Why would Weiner call it a insurance file ? But you just dismiss these issues as, No patterns being established. now my turn to say wow. How did you miss these points ? or did you ?
So you have no idea that he could be working as counter intelligence for the Deep State, and was attempting to get in good with the Q movement and injecting his stories into the movement in order to lead them astray and eventually destroy their reputation and turn people away from them? Do you ever think about that when you research his or anyone else's claims? After all, you seem to be suggesting that you're experienced in this sort of thing.
Neither do you ? but if you easily excuse no pattern of truth and information being removed from the internet as not a MO happening, what else are you dismissing . it is possible what you claim, but until we have more. we have to research more. right now we do not have what we would need to decide one way or the other. and yes I am looking to see if he is DS plant or if he is legit. Just like I am always aware of controlled opposition. And Thank you for the cheap shot. I did retire from LE. that is not a suggestion but a fact.
Not really. You're all over the place but saying nothing. You're not making any strong arguments in defense of your claims that Johnheretohelp is legitimate. You're rambling on about this and that and not being very clear at all what your point is, if you even have one. Perhaps you're just trying to waste my time trying to decipher that wall of text.
I forgive your lack of experience, in investigations everything needs to be looked into, and may appear one is all over the place, like I stated also , which you ignored is, we need to continue to dig. we need more answers. so we ask more questions. simple as that.
Perhaps you're just trying to waste my time trying to decipher that wall of text.
Really ? maybe this is projection on your part. Now the conversation is over, I will continue to dig for answers, and you can sit with the information you have and relax since you appear to have it all solved.
You already posted this wall of text to me, and I already responded.
The first line of it shows how ridiculous your logic is.
(post is archived)