Watch the water but further south. | Poal: Say what you want.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

•

Q posted watch the water, we assumed coastal CONUS but what about the Panama Canal? It is under control of china.

"...On January 16, 1997, the Panamanian National Legislature passed "Law 5" which granted Hutchison-Whampoa a lease to manage the locks of the Panama Canal using pilot boat crews which could consist of up to 25% of troops from the People's Liberation Army of China. These crews include harbor police boat crews for Port Balboa on the Pacific side of the canal and for Port Cristobel on the Atlantic side. By empowering this new Port Authority, Law 5 violates the 1997 Panama Canal treaty with the United States governing the order of passage for ships proceeding through the canal. No one in the Clinton administration has objected to this move by the country of Panama..."

http://holyhillcross.com/PANAMA.CANAL.htm

https://www.stltoday.com/opinion/mailbag/carter-obama-to-blame-for-chinas-control-of-canal/article_b02fbec1-7874-5250-81d2-80927ba4ac75.html

Q posted watch the water, we assumed coastal CONUS but what about the Panama Canal? It is under control of china. "...On January 16, 1997, the Panamanian National Legislature passed "Law 5" which granted Hutchison-Whampoa a lease to manage the locks of the Panama Canal using pilot boat crews which could consist of up to 25% of troops from the People's Liberation Army of China. These crews include harbor police boat crews for Port Balboa on the Pacific side of the canal and for Port Cristobel on the Atlantic side. By empowering this new Port Authority, Law 5 violates the 1997 Panama Canal treaty with the United States governing the order of passage for ships proceeding through the canal. No one in the Clinton administration has objected to this move by the country of Panama..." http://holyhillcross.com/PANAMA.CANAL.htm https://www.stltoday.com/opinion/mailbag/carter-obama-to-blame-for-chinas-control-of-canal/article_b02fbec1-7874-5250-81d2-80927ba4ac75.html

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Time to take it back. Pretty sure US armed forces could do it quick without damage to the locks and with minimal loss of life on our side anyways.

link

[–] • 0 pt

I am sure they could but what ccp assets have already passed through and are staged in international waters with their transponders in the off position?

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

I believe CCP have control of islands at the mouth of the canal. Positive our military knows where they are and their strength. It’s time to remove them from our hemisphere. The deep state and CCP are interdependent. My guess is both are taken down at the same time.