He won't do it. He's a pussy.
He won't do it. He's a pussy.
In an October article anticipating a potentially disputed election, Professor Scott R. Anderson noted:
Throughout U.S. history, some have argued that this constitutional role and related statutory authority provide the vice president with some substantive authority over the counting process, including by determining which electoral votes should be counted in cases of dispute...
So according to this prominent professor, opinion has long been divided on what the vice president is empowered to do in his vote-counting role. Ivan Raiklin is hardly alone in his argument. It should not surprise us. Constitutional law frequently is not black and white, as seen in the numerous 5-4 Supreme Court decisions by Justices applying the same law to the same facts.
In other words, Pence should go for it. He need only interpret “votes” as votes from states not in dispute, and count them accordingly. He could declare, “I will not count the Biden electors, or the competing slates of Trump electors, in disputed states where there is overwhelming credible evidence of systemic fraud.” Thus would he restore the election win to President Trump, from whom it was audaciously stolen.
What would Pence have to lose? A commenter at Legal Insurrection observed:
Pence should refuse to count votes from the contested states, and dare someone to sue him in court. Then the SCOTUS can simply docket that for January 21, 2021.
If the SCOTUS can’t stop states from stealing elections, they damn well don’t have the power to stop Pence from counting the votes any way he wants to.
And we do not owe them anything more than that.
*In an October article anticipating a potentially disputed election, Professor Scott R. Anderson noted:*
*Throughout U.S. history, some have argued that this constitutional role and related statutory authority provide the vice president with some substantive authority over the counting process, including by determining which electoral votes should be counted in cases of dispute...*
*So according to this prominent professor, opinion has long been divided on what the vice president is empowered to do in his vote-counting role. Ivan Raiklin is hardly alone in his argument. It should not surprise us. Constitutional law frequently is not black and white, as seen in the numerous 5-4 Supreme Court decisions by Justices applying the same law to the same facts.*
*In other words, Pence should go for it. He need only interpret “votes” as votes from states not in dispute, and count them accordingly. He could declare, “I will not count the Biden electors, or the competing slates of Trump electors, in disputed states where there is overwhelming credible evidence of systemic fraud.” Thus would he restore the election win to President Trump, from whom it was audaciously stolen.*
*What would Pence have to lose? A commenter at Legal Insurrection observed:*
*Pence should refuse to count votes from the contested states, and dare someone to sue him in court. Then the SCOTUS can simply docket that for January 21, 2021.*
*If the SCOTUS can’t stop states from stealing elections, they damn well don’t have the power to stop Pence from counting the votes any way he wants to.*
And we do not owe them anything more than that.
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has congratulated Biden and Harris on winning the election
Does anyone think McConnell might be playing a role for Trump? Does he play a key position in the outcome of Jan. 6?
I have no idea myself. I'm not really familiar with US politics or McConnell. I'm just wondering what others who do think about this.
>Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has congratulated Biden and Harris on winning the election
Does anyone think McConnell might be playing a role for Trump? Does he play a key position in the outcome of Jan. 6?
I have no idea myself. I'm not really familiar with US politics or McConnell. I'm just wondering what others who do think about this.
I just apply common sense to the situation, does Mike Pence want to be a national hero, a man that was well within the law when he stood for righteousness, or does he want to be forever hunted as a traitor by over 100 million of his fellow countrymen? He would have to be a complete reprobate to be this blind and stupid, I just don't see it.
We also have another ally on our side and that is the LORD. This is His form of government. In the prophecy of Daniel, the image that God shewed Daniel, of the four kingdoms/rulers to come, the image was "bright" but the "FORM was terrible." As the LORD warned His people in Samuel 1, the king you seek will make you his servant. The LORD shewed Daniel a stone cut out of the mountain WITHOUT HANDS, signifying that God, not man, break into pieces and consumed the kingdom/rulers and their FORM of governance. The Pilgrims sailed to this land to escape the Church of England (one of the ten toes of clay and iron that grew from the Roman Empire) consecrated this land in the Name of Jesus Christ, wrote a document (US Constitution) that could only be given through Divine Guidance and set the people free from their rulers. We are now a self determining government, as were the children of Israel under Moses. As the LORD also told Daniel, His Kingdom shall stand forever and will not be given to others.
God wins.
I just apply common sense to the situation, does Mike Pence want to be a national hero, a man that was well within the law when he stood for righteousness, or does he want to be forever hunted as a traitor by over 100 million of his fellow countrymen? He would have to be a complete reprobate to be this blind and stupid, I just don't see it.
We also have another ally on our side and that is the LORD. This is His form of government. In the prophecy of Daniel, the image that God shewed Daniel, of the four kingdoms/rulers to come, the image was "bright" but the "FORM was terrible." As the LORD warned His people in Samuel 1, the king you seek will make you his servant. The LORD shewed Daniel a stone cut out of the mountain WITHOUT HANDS, signifying that God, not man, break into pieces and consumed the kingdom/rulers and their FORM of governance. The Pilgrims sailed to this land to escape the Church of England (one of the ten toes of clay and iron that grew from the Roman Empire) consecrated this land in the Name of Jesus Christ, wrote a document (US Constitution) that could only be given through Divine Guidance and set the people free from their rulers. We are now a self determining government, as were the children of Israel under Moses. As the LORD also told Daniel, His Kingdom shall stand forever and will not be given to others.
God wins.
It's in the hands of the military, it's the only way.
Pence is a pedophile piss ant
It's in the hands of the military, it's the only way.
Pence is a pedophile piss ant
They keep reporting Pence will not sign on and he is leaving for Israel the day after January 6th.
Either side will come after him the next day so when and how will he return? :)
They keep reporting Pence will not sign on and he is leaving for Israel the day after January 6th.
Either side will come after him the next day so when and how will he return? :)
PS Saving Israel for last?
PS
Saving Israel for last?
(post is archived)