Not necessarily. If it's a psyop (WH or BH), it will have elements to it that are meant to lead you to think certain things, and then confuse you with counter elements. You see symbolism because you believe that's what you see, but there might be other reasons for those things that don't mean it's a BH operation.
Symbolism is used for identifying/messaging to others in a group. It serves no purpose to outsiders. If you can explain who and why they would need to identify/message to others in their group, you might have something. Otherwise I think you're just drawing conclusions to satisfy your belief that it's a BH operation.
What you state could possibly be correct. Whenever something like this happens I always look for those symbolic indicators they have used in the past. Owls are one of those symbols. It is like they are leaving a signature. I will have to go back and find the previous operations where HOOTERS was at the scene. I have seen it before but did not at the time make a record of it. Maybe now I will.
My point is that it does not matter if we put any credence to the symbolism - they do. Like pedo symbolism, it is how they send signals to each other. They are not meant for the average person to see - and that is the power they believe it gives them. Having the symbolism in plain sight but unrecognized, they believe we give tacid approval. This is why exposure is deadly to them and their greatest fear. Especially, since we still have guns.
They are not meant for the average person to see - and that is the power they believe it gives them.
They don't actually believe that symbols give them power, like casting as spell or whatever. They act like signs or reminders that are meant for others in the know. But I don't think that was the case here. You just chanced on making a connection to other ops where Hooters was used.
Having the symbolism in plain sight but unrecognized, they believe we give tacid approval.
Who is 'we'?
The only reason they (the BH) might have used Hooters is because whoever owns or runs Hooters is tied to their group and they needed it as a staging area. The CIA is known to own all kinds of properties and businesses that they frequently use in their ops, placing agents or assets within them as sleepers to be called on when needed. This is more likely the case here, whether it's CIA or some other agency or group.
The alleged bomber was tied to several different properties on that street he lived on. Over the years, the deeds had been passed around to various people within his family and to those women who were associated with him. The shuffling around suggests they might have been owned by the CIA or some other group and used in various ops over the years, using them to give their people residences as part of their false identities/backgrounds during the ops. The same activity can be found in the Sandy Hook case, where properties in Newtown were unexplainably deeded to various people tied to the event. Newtown is said to be a haven for Deep State operatives, where they own a lot of the properties and businesses and use them in their operations when needed.
So I don't think Hooters was meant as a symbol, but was possibly used because of the above.
Great points and I believe you are on the money with the connections. Thanks.
There are elements within that power structure however that are Satanists and practice dark arts. They are the ones that thrive on the symbolism and think they obtain power from it. They are another thread that runs through the corruption and are an element that is often overlooked. They are all throughout the government - kind of like the CCP.
Thanks again for all that analysis. We all work together to figure this out. Man, I miss VOAT. Glad to see you here Patriot. I can always count on you to give me another way to look at things.
(post is archived)