There can have been absolutely zero need for them to use a missile or energy weapon to achieve whatever the desired destruction was. None. Plain ol' explosives will do it. When you see a horse running at you, figure it's a horse, not that it's a clone of a reptilian space creature that has shapeshifted to look like a horse. Here we see explosives, not a missile or energy weapon. Second, there is exactly zero evidence requiring a missile or energy beam to explain. A plume going UPWARDS at relatively modest speed is evidence of neither. There is also, incidentally, another video showing no plume, leaving a possibility that the plume video is 'shopped, though it's possible that the black and white video with plume could have picked up in infrared what the color video did not. Unsolved there. But in any case the plume if real does not show a missile or energy beam, nothing like, quite the opposite really. Some base their claims entirely on whether it supports narratives they like. Period. Bring in Space Force, bring in DEW, bring in missiles... don't need no stinkin' evidence or any need for such. Underground explosion in AT&T/NSA building which jets out of the sidewalk elevator shaft (as the evidence for underground explosion) leaving scorch mark up the side of the building plus throwing an elevator piston out of the shaft, visible in a photo, plus essentially pyrotechnics from RV as distraction, plus perhaps explosives in building across the street owned by Cerberus. That's what we have evidence for. It's probably correct that the RV is a red herring. But it's either evidence-free whackjobness to claim energy weapons or missiles, or disinfo to discredit our claims should we repeat the disinfo. "Dude! Did you hear about the Nashville explosion? It was a directed energy beam from space! The White Hats did it using Space Force!" Followed by being ignored forever as a complete nut by the person hearing such whackjobbery. Edit: Aw, I see someone's feewings were hurt (downvote)