Great point. I did find his commentaries and manner strange, not to mention his lack of curiousity (judging from no change in pace or body direction) as passing the RV which reportedly was blaring such a striking message.
A little convenient to be sure.
If so, then it could be edited to cover up sound of initial underground blast. The apparent lack of that sound is the only thing I find that makes other evidence not seem to quite match each other. (Plume appearing before visible blast, yet apparently soundlessly or quietly if bodycam video is accurate.)
Highly unlikely IMO the average cop on the street would have known about this hub, let alone drop that info that way and at that time.
Great point. I did find his commentaries and manner strange, not to mention his lack of curiousity (judging from no change in pace or body direction) as passing the RV which reportedly was blaring such a striking message.
A little convenient to be sure.
If so, then it could be edited to cover up sound of initial underground blast. The apparent lack of that sound is the only thing I find that makes other evidence not seem to quite match each other. (Plume appearing before visible blast, yet apparently soundlessly or quietly if bodycam video is accurate.)
Highly unlikely IMO the average cop on the street would have known about this hub, let alone drop that info that way and at that time.
Yeah funny how that is.
Yeah funny how that is.
(post is archived)