David Zhang is very good. A lot of information, concise, does his own research and often finds things others don't.
Some further evidence he does not cover:
From overhead view in front of the NSA building there is an exposed shaft, which by itself appears either an elevator shaft or ventilation shaft. I'd have guessed ventilation, but one person identifies an object lying to our left as an elevator piston. (Underground elevators able to reach street level don't have a cable house on top to pull them, but are pushed from below.)
How would a street explosion blow the piston out the shaft?
There's an incredibly obvious mark running up the side of the building directly above and even with the shaft. It looks like what you'd expect from gases jetting out of the shaft and does not match at all with street explosion as the cause.
Further, there's a video which unless fake (I have no information) views the explosion well through a window across the street from it, and it's IMO not that big an explosion. It doesn't blow out the window either. More than sufficient to destroy the van and create a big pyrotechnic red herring, but nothing like needed to do all the damage seen.
Here are links:
NASHVILLE EXPLOSION: War Between the CIA & NSA Heats Up | SOTN: Alternative News, Analysis & Commentary (stateofthenation.co) (stateofthenation.co)
Scorch mark above shaft (mail.google.com) Shaft location before blast (mail.google.com)
Video through window (zerohedge.com)
Object identified as elevator piston, and the shaft (drive.google.com)
Photos After The Explosion Reveal That The Bombing Target The AT&T Building In Nashville Is Reinforced NSA Style Building – Right Journalism (rightjournalism.com)
My take is at least two explosions. Pyrotechnics (essentially) from the RV. Underground explosion within NSA building. Possibly also explosions inside buildings across the street, reportedly owned by Cerberus.
From a police bodycam recording, there is only one sound of any explosion, so if multiple explosions, they were simultaneous, and/or the underground explosion, being underground, may not have been so loud at the distance the cop was.
The plume in one video, which people need to note goes from ground to sky not the other way around and at relatively modest speed, could be from that shaft. But as it precedes visible explosion, that would require the sound level from that underground explosion to have not been obvious on the cop's bodycam. Bit of a mystery there.
Btw, I found it amusing that the FBI claims to have found the bullets from the reported gunshots. In all that debris, over such a wide potential area, so quickly. Reminded me of their success in right away finding 9/11 "passports," and all the falsified results over decades from the FBI Crime Lab.
And then ypu have this.. Listen to what the cop says at the 2.40 "That building houses the hardlines for all the phones of the South East." (even though the AT&T building is not in that block). Then, after they walk around the corner the "bomb" goes off. Scripted? Inside job? Cop didn't even flinch when the bomb went off. He was the trigger man https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7N0dY5Jtm4
Great point. I did find his commentaries and manner strange, not to mention his lack of curiousity (judging from no change in pace or body direction) as passing the RV which reportedly was blaring such a striking message.
A little convenient to be sure.
If so, then it could be edited to cover up sound of initial underground blast. The apparent lack of that sound is the only thing I find that makes other evidence not seem to quite match each other. (Plume appearing before visible blast, yet apparently soundlessly or quietly if bodycam video is accurate.)
Highly unlikely IMO the average cop on the street would have known about this hub, let alone drop that info that way and at that time.
Yeah funny how that is.
(post is archived)