You can not look at a high speed event and assume the camera caught everything perfectly. We have to took at how the camera captures an image or series of images when it comes to video. If the camera is recording at 30 frames a second it misses a hell of a lot in the first few milliseconds. There are 1000 milliseconds in a second. The camera recording at 30 per second would be capturing only about 3% of what would be happening in milliseconds. In this case the video frame just before the blast and the next frame which would be the first recorded of the blast are 1/30th of a second apart. When it comes to a blast that is one hell of a lot of time. I am not an expert on this at all but that just makes sense.
So just looking at any video recording at that speed you really cannot tell exactly where the blast started. The contrail if there was one is something completely different. I just don't think we should be saying the video proves that it was not a car bomb.
Full of shit. The eyes don't lie. Neither does timing. Building 7 all over again. How much gaslighting do you faggots think you can get away with? To all you Patriots: Hold the line and don't fall for this kind of gaslighting! WWG1WGA!
All I am saying is you have to look at the way the video is captured. there is always a delay. We don't pay attention because most of the time we are not looking at split seconds. To say this makes no sense is just not right. I am not saying there was or wasn't a car bomb. I am only saying we have to consider the limitations of the video capture. The idea here is to share what we are thinking and try to understand what is really happening. Democrats are good at assuming without thinking. Let's not do that here.
I agree with you. Sometimes you can get really lucky with low fps capture and get a really good still frame (like of a bullet in flight) but that's super rare.
Try this:
Fuck off felcher.
yes, but we are looking at a capture of some sort
I agree with you that it looks off. What I was trying to point out is the way the video is captured. What we see as one frame is really not a single image. It is a scan. The scan works from one corner and moves to the opposite corner line by line. Of course it happens very fast but not fast enough for what we are talking about. Halfway through a scan something could have changed in the area already scanned. Picture the scan as dots being recorded like a printer. It works its way down the page to complete the picture. Then starts over again
Everything could have happened just like you said. I am only pointing out that we have to be willing to consider this possibility.
This was explained to me years ago. I am not an expert. i am just sharing what I learned at the time. I am only saying it is a possibility that we should not toss away because we don't lilke it.
No, I understand you and you're right. Even though it was CCTV, it's been transferred to video at probably either 60 frames a second or 24 frames a second, so there's a lot of loss like you say.
I don't think we'll ever know by looking at video of the blast. Another video of a police body-cam taken less than a minute before the explosion reveals that there was nothing on the other side of the street that could have caused the explosion:
(post is archived)