This makes better sense. RV was a decoy.
This makes better sense. RV was a decoy.
Yea I sawr this, pretty interesting. It brings memories of the LV shooting, doc angles and such.
Yea I sawr this, pretty interesting. It brings memories of the LV shooting, doc angles and such.
One video showed a vapor trail from a possible missle.
One video showed a vapor trail from a possible missle.
The 'vapor trail' was moving up from the site, not down from the sky. It was likely a projectile that flew off whatever exploded, and the smoke plume followed after it because the projectile opened up a hole to release pressure.
The 'vapor trail' was moving up from the site, not down from the sky. It was likely a projectile that flew off whatever exploded, and the smoke plume followed after it because the projectile opened up a hole to release pressure.
Perfectly logical explanation. Occams Razor.
Perfectly logical explanation. Occams Razor.
It occured before the explosion it appears. Im not making claims just digging.
It occured before the explosion it appears. Im not making claims just digging.
Yep, I saw that one too--made a giant fucking hole in the street beside the building
Yep, I saw that one too--made a giant fucking hole in the street beside the building
Hmm
Railgun from space
Hmm
Railgun from space
This is a video of the rooftop of AT&T. Noticed the entry hole into the building.
This is a video of the rooftop of AT&T. Noticed the entry hole into the building.
https://youtu.be/8kQVWDPB0YU?t=291
Here's a more reliable source:
This is from the video:
Here's a more reliable source:
https://youtu.be/d5dQtS2YdZU
This is from the video:
https://files.catbox.moe/tvnlph.jpg
Seems more pyrotechnics than the real blast or blasts, of which at least one was I think underground within the NSA building, and possibly another within the building across the street.
Seems more pyrotechnics than the real blast or blasts, of which at least one was I think underground within the NSA building, and possibly another within the building across the street.
You can not look at a high speed event and assume the camera caught everything perfectly. We have to took at how the camera captures an image or series of images when it comes to video. If the camera is recording at 30 frames a second it misses a hell of a lot in the first few milliseconds. There are 1000 milliseconds in a second. The camera recording at 30 per second would be capturing only about 3% of what would be happening in milliseconds. In this case the video frame just before the blast and the next frame which would be the first recorded of the blast are 1/30th of a second apart. When it comes to a blast that is one hell of a lot of time. I am not an expert on this at all but that just makes sense.
So just looking at any video recording at that speed you really cannot tell exactly where the blast started. The contrail if there was one is something completely different. I just don't think we should be saying the video proves that it was not a car bomb.
You can not look at a high speed event and assume the camera caught everything perfectly. We have to took at how the camera captures an image or series of images when it comes to video. If the camera is recording at 30 frames a second it misses a hell of a lot in the first few milliseconds. There are 1000 milliseconds in a second. The camera recording at 30 per second would be capturing only about 3% of what would be happening in milliseconds. In this case the video frame just before the blast and the next frame which would be the first recorded of the blast are 1/30th of a second apart. When it comes to a blast that is one hell of a lot of time. I am not an expert on this at all but that just makes sense.
So just looking at any video recording at that speed you really cannot tell exactly where the blast started. The contrail if there was one is something completely different. I just don't think we should be saying the video proves that it was not a car bomb.
Full of shit. The eyes don't lie. Neither does timing. Building 7 all over again. How much gaslighting do you faggots think you can get away with? To all you Patriots: Hold the line and don't fall for this kind of gaslighting! WWG1WGA!
Full of shit. The eyes don't lie. Neither does timing. Building 7 all over again. How much gaslighting do you faggots think you can get away with? To all you Patriots: Hold the line and don't fall for this kind of gaslighting! WWG1WGA!
All I am saying is you have to look at the way the video is captured. there is always a delay. We don't pay attention because most of the time we are not looking at split seconds. To say this makes no sense is just not right. I am not saying there was or wasn't a car bomb. I am only saying we have to consider the limitations of the video capture. The idea here is to share what we are thinking and try to understand what is really happening. Democrats are good at assuming without thinking. Let's not do that here.
All I am saying is you have to look at the way the video is captured. there is always a delay. We don't pay attention because most of the time we are not looking at split seconds.
To say this makes no sense is just not right. I am not saying there was or wasn't a car bomb. I am only saying we have to consider the limitations of the video capture.
The idea here is to share what we are thinking and try to understand what is really happening.
Democrats are good at assuming without thinking. Let's not do that here.
I agree with you. Sometimes you can get really lucky with low fps capture and get a really good still frame (like of a bullet in flight) but that's super rare.
I agree with you. Sometimes you can get really lucky with low fps capture and get a really good still frame (like of a bullet in flight) but that's super rare.
Try this:
Try this:
https://youtu.be/d5dQtS2YdZU
Fuck off felcher.
https://youtu.be/d5dQtS2YdZU
Fuck off felcher.
https://youtu.be/d5dQtS2YdZU
yes, but we are looking at a capture of some sort
yes, but we are looking at a capture of some sort
Here you go:
https://youtu.be/d5dQtS2YdZU
Stills:
https://files.catbox.moe/560g25.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/tvnlph.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/s6ed69.jpg
I agree with you that it looks off. What I was trying to point out is the way the video is captured. What we see as one frame is really not a single image. It is a scan. The scan works from one corner and moves to the opposite corner line by line. Of course it happens very fast but not fast enough for what we are talking about. Halfway through a scan something could have changed in the area already scanned. Picture the scan as dots being recorded like a printer. It works its way down the page to complete the picture. Then starts over again
Everything could have happened just like you said. I am only pointing out that we have to be willing to consider this possibility.
This was explained to me years ago. I am not an expert. i am just sharing what I learned at the time. I am only saying it is a possibility that we should not toss away because we don't lilke it.
I agree with you that it looks off. What I was trying to point out is the way the video is captured. What we see as one frame is really not a single image. It is a scan. The scan works from one corner and moves to the opposite corner line by line. Of course it happens very fast but not fast enough for what we are talking about.
Halfway through a scan something could have changed in the area already scanned.
Picture the scan as dots being recorded like a printer. It works its way down the page to complete the picture. Then starts over again
Everything could have happened just like you said. I am only pointing out that we have to be willing to consider this possibility.
This was explained to me years ago. I am not an expert. i am just sharing what I learned at the time.
I am only saying it is a possibility that we should not toss away because we don't lilke it.
No, I understand you and you're right. Even though it was CCTV, it's been transferred to video at probably either 60 frames a second or 24 frames a second, so there's a lot of loss like you say.
I don't think we'll ever know by looking at video of the blast. Another video of a police body-cam taken less than a minute before the explosion reveals that there was nothing on the other side of the street that could have caused the explosion:
No, I understand you and you're right. Even though it was CCTV, it's been transferred to video at probably either 60 frames a second or 24 frames a second, so there's a lot of loss like you say.
I don't think we'll ever know by looking at video of the blast. Another video of a police body-cam taken less than a minute before the explosion reveals that there was nothing on the other side of the street that could have caused the explosion:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9oGYaoKDi26f/
What a shitty video this one was posted 10 hrs ago, maybe even longer
What a shitty video this one was posted 10 hrs ago, maybe even longer
https://hooktube.com/f1d-brLlXwI
Still doesnt show the missle/DEW
Still doesnt show the missle/DEW
There wasn't one.
There wasn't one.
That shows the end of the flash not the beginning.
That shows the end of the flash not the beginning.
https://files.catbox.moe/560g25.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/tvnlph.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/s6ed69.jpg
Fake and gay.
Fake and gay.
(post is archived)