WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Long range weapons are absolutely real. Whether it was from 5g small cell towers, using them as proxies, or an entirely different range of weapon, it is not clearly understood, from the 190-page report, where exactly these frequencies were being shot from, but they were happening and causing the 'COVID' symptoms that we saw on the cruise ship (equipped with 5g that was redistributed from satellites), Milan italy (Huawei 5g), Wuhan (world's first 5g city), and I believe Iran was included?

NYC is a bit more of a crapshoot, but I would figure that 5g would have been installed there first and if it was huawei perhaps it was used by the dark agenda for a period of time before they stopped it.

Remember the trump admin does not have all the data either, and everyone lies to them. So we are all trying to piece this together.

Please review this content for a better overview - https://www.bitchute.com/video/fEMvSKV26h02/

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Of course long range weapons exist...but they're not 5G. They're designed for focused, short intense bursts of energy to take out incoming missles/drones. The power necessary to blanket a cruise ship with harmful EMF would be far beyond the capacity of any space-based weapon. The systems on cruise ships simply receive a satellite signal and then distribute it via small 5G WIFI routers on the ship. The frequency of the shipboard WIFI isn't in the harmful range.

You're really reaching to match reality with the paranoid fantasy you believe. Your overview just conflates fearmongering scenarios with possible technical abuses.

Don't get me wrong. EMF exposure is unhealthy and dangerously out of control even without considering 5G. But I don't buy the association with COVID you suggest.

[–] 0 pt

well good luck, all the clues are there. guess we can just drop it sherlock :D

[–] 0 pt

bro this is what im talking about - https://www.brighteon.com/ec2d908b-e5fb-4a22-af3d-02d0736641c3

there are SO many intense frequencies hitting people now, especially in dense areas. the readings are off the charts. people are slowly dying from this shit. I am telling you.

BTW: The guy's meter will likely be pinned the same way if he holds it to his phone. How close to your head do you hold your phone when your're talking on it? I just bought an old-style handset with a coil cord that plugs into my cellphone audio jack. Works great and allows me to avoid irradiating my brain.

Low information fearmongering nonsense. Doesn't show the frequency range he's measuring or the scale of the readings. There are no high-frequency 5G installations in Atlanta or anywhere else in the US. There are no phones available to the public that have the capability of receiving the HF 5G signals. All installations are low freq.

That said, we are all surrounded by a fog of EMF and it is ultimately not healthy. It is not the drop-dead-on-the-spot danger of a certain HF 5G range, but it does have effects. Better to discuss that then to run around fearmongering with the 5G buzzword.

Here's a little experiment that demonstrates the inverse square law with regard to radiation. Hold a fluorescent tube in your hands and walk toward a high-voltage power line. As you get close, the lamp will flicker and when you're directly under the lines, the lamp will be fully lit. Walk away from the lines and the lamp quickly extinguishes. The lamp is excited by the EMF generated by the high voltage. The intensity of the EMF varies with the square of the distance from the source. Move twice as far away and the signal diminishes by a factor of 4. Move 16 times away and the signal diminishes by a factor of 16. The same principle applies to any radiation.