Telling you that you're misinformed? Your words, not mine. And exactly when did I do that, goat? You've actually presented no information about any of this. No articles, police reports, nothing. I've presented you with other stories and articles, and, had you actually "lived" there, you'd know damn well how dangerous unguarded crossings are, especially ones that T-intersection like the second story clearly shows. In fact, you aren't even OP who flat out refused to discuss anything with me when I presented information that was different than his little world showed him. When you want to actually discuss this like rational adults instead of crying about it, please come back. I'll happily discuss any points you have, but that's your choice. You can insult me if you want, that just tells me you know you don't have anything that's useful. Or, you can get some real information and we can talk about it. Why don't we start with article #2, since that's the one that has the clearest amount of information? Or do you still insist that "terrorism" is the only situation that could have caused this?