Lol! I guess I can relate to some degree. These phrases have meaning to those following Q. Would it be better to spend a paragraph spelling out the same intended message? These short phrases convey a lot of meaning to those who have spent time researching Q, "future proves past" or "future unlocks past", as obtuse as it sounds on face value, just means that some information was revealed earlier that gains new meaning after future events occur. In this case, he posted it a couple years ago but no one could see the truth in it. Now that it has happened in what is the future, everyone can see the unrecognized truth in what was posted in the past. Q did the same thing, crumbs of information embedded in Qdrops that no one understood at the time (but many would speculate their meaning before key events unlocked the real meaning). As time went on and events unfold, rereading those drops gained new meaning and insight, revealing hidden prior Q knowledge if you will.
I'm not concerned with being called a cult, I know better. The MSM can push that story all they want. What cult tells you to be careful who you trust and to research for yourself? No cult I've ever read about. Q used the Socratic method to teach us for over 3 years now. It would be hard to put all of these meaningful insider phrases on the shelf in a QStorm subverse.
Amen brother! ;)
I mean, you have some valid points, but to the layman checking this place out due to curiosity or having just begun the redpill process that kind of obscure language is a turn off. I've been following the Q movement for years now and I still have a healthy dose of skepticism because it's attracted plenty of nut cases along the way.
I'd like to see these kinds of subs be more palatable to the curious normie rather than "these guys are friggin nutjobs" kind of reaction I've gotten from friends.
VOAT had a few subverses of varying degrees of "Qness". QRV was hardcore Q, totally anonymous subverse (toned down version of the 4chn/8kun wild west), GreatAwakening was a well mannered Q research subverse (my favorite), theawakening which did not discuss much Q but was involved in similar geopolitical discussion, and others that totally excluded Q. There was a good fit for everyone, and as knowledge and curiosity increased, more ventured into the Q centric subs.
TBH, I think we are well past the Q is a conspiracy theory tin hat cult accusation. MSM has written extensive yellow journalism against Q, Dems fear Q. All for a LARP?
If the normies ventured into VOAT/v/PizzaGate/ ... far more shocking than a simple three word phrase. There are plenty of truths that the normies won't want to try to digest in one meal. They will need to want to know the truth wherever it leads, and have an open mind that MSM and the people they follow may have been lying to them most/all of their lives. As they research our work, they will see our digs complete with irrefutable videos, articles and documents of the guilty parties doing very bad things. I guess the key point is they need to want to know the truth with the proof to back it up. To reuse one of Q's phrases again, "sometimes you can't just tell somebody something, you have to show them" and our collective research does that. Or did that ... VOAT may shut down but will still be searchable via searchvoat.co until further notice.
Maybe QStorm will not be easily digestible to the curious normie raised on a diet of pablum all of their lives that happen to stumble upon QStorm. The covfefe is too strong, the meat is too rich, the servings too large. If it fits the anons doing the heavy lifting and aggregating the important breaking news, epiphanies, digs and Q related discussion, it is working as it should and the essence of those truths will quickly spread across all platforms as anons spread it like bees and pollen. Maybe a milder version(s) of the QStorm subverse is needed on POAL like the old VOAT model? Qlite? NonQ?
(post is archived)