"Sometimes you can't just tell somebody something, you have to show them"
"Future proves past"
I'm all for the grassroots research the q movement has brought to the table online, but for the love of God, can we stop regurgitating cult like quips like "future proves past" I mean... There is nothing more dangerous than group-think
Lol! I guess I can relate to some degree. These phrases have meaning to those following Q. Would it be better to spend a paragraph spelling out the same intended message? These short phrases convey a lot of meaning to those who have spent time researching Q, "future proves past" or "future unlocks past", as obtuse as it sounds on face value, just means that some information was revealed earlier that gains new meaning after future events occur. In this case, he posted it a couple years ago but no one could see the truth in it. Now that it has happened in what is the future, everyone can see the unrecognized truth in what was posted in the past. Q did the same thing, crumbs of information embedded in Qdrops that no one understood at the time (but many would speculate their meaning before key events unlocked the real meaning). As time went on and events unfold, rereading those drops gained new meaning and insight, revealing hidden prior Q knowledge if you will.
I'm not concerned with being called a cult, I know better. The MSM can push that story all they want. What cult tells you to be careful who you trust and to research for yourself? No cult I've ever read about. Q used the Socratic method to teach us for over 3 years now. It would be hard to put all of these meaningful insider phrases on the shelf in a QStorm subverse.
Amen brother! ;)
I mean, you have some valid points, but to the layman checking this place out due to curiosity or having just begun the redpill process that kind of obscure language is a turn off. I've been following the Q movement for years now and I still have a healthy dose of skepticism because it's attracted plenty of nut cases along the way.
I'd like to see these kinds of subs be more palatable to the curious normie rather than "these guys are friggin nutjobs" kind of reaction I've gotten from friends.
(post is archived)