WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

764

That is a step in the right direction.

That is a step in the right direction.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

The only agreement has been we have free will, after that it is Thy will be done, no exception to policy. What martin Luther found were many exceptions to policy, now who is in charge really ? may explain why the church is where it is today because of those exception to policy, Example the bible clearly states, no word will be added or subtracted or they will be removed from the book of life, yet these words were allowed to be changed ignoring the warning, I would be leery of anyone that has to look down to see God. we do have free will, and that means we will be held accountable for our choices.

[–] 0 pt

It's interesting how you talk about free will and Martin Luther in the same breath, since Luther wrote a treatise on how the will is enslaved and all evil is caused by God.

You also mention not removing words from the Bible, yet Luther did just that by removing the deuterocanonicals (and he wanted to remove the book of James!).

He's a heretic.

[–] 0 pt

I did not defend any of their actions, so do not place words in my mouth, and free will has always been in play, and like i pointed out and you missed, we make choices, and that will depend in us facing rewards or consequences. I suggest reading slower, you wont be so tired jumping to conclusions.

[–] 0 pt

Where do you claim I put words in your mouth? I was just stating that it is interesting that you so frequently cite Martin Luther, and yet espouse positions radically different from his own.