Suuuure, "The software program, Election Source, worked properly and correctly counted votes, but the county missed an operation step..." Gee, an "operation step". In that case you won't mind a few random manual recounts to see if any other "operation steps" were missed. It looks as though you're going to get them whether you mind or not.
I could give you literally any explanation about any topic in any level of detail, and if the result isn't something Donald Trump would be happy about then there's no chance you would ever understand it.
Give an explanation for why your "fact -checkers" made no mention of the manual recount that exposed the "glitch" then.
what? please, be more vague so I can have even less of an idea which state and news story you're talking about
(post is archived)