I could give you literally any explanation about any topic in any level of detail, and if the result isn't something Donald Trump would be happy about then there's no chance you would ever understand it.
Give an explanation for why your "fact -checkers" made no mention of the manual recount that exposed the "glitch" then.
what? please, be more vague so I can have even less of an idea which state and news story you're talking about
In Michigan the question was why 6,000 votes were transferred from Trump to Biden. The "fact checking" site that you cited claimed it was the result of a human error in input and as soon as that was rectified, the vote counting machine returned a correct vote count. Bullshit! The fraud was exposed when the votes were manually recounted and the machine shown to be transferring votes from Trump to Biden.
There are 47 counties in Michigan that use the same machine and software. Your weak suck claim is that Trump is too cheap to call for a manual recount in Michigan. Makes sense to a libturd, I suppose.
(post is archived)