You're actually sorta right, even though you don't realize it. Almost always when people say "software glitch" they don't actually mean a bitflip kind of computer glitch or even a programming error.... almost always, like the 6,000 in MI, it's user error
How do I know this? Because I read reliable sources that don't purposely mislead you by failing to explain that and then failing to report on the truth when it comes out:
The software program, Election Source, worked properly and correctly counted votes, but the county missed an operation step, the statement said. This resulted in a miscommunication between the software and the county’s central election management system that was quickly corrected.
“This was an isolated error, there is no evidence this user error occurred elsewhere in the state, and if it did it would be caught during county canvasses, which are conducted by bipartisan boards of county canvassers.”
https://factcheck.afp.com/michigan-county-vote-count-glitch-was-not-fraud
Get bent, hoaxer
Suuuure, "The software program, Election Source, worked properly and correctly counted votes, but the county missed an operation step..." Gee, an "operation step". In that case you won't mind a few random manual recounts to see if any other "operation steps" were missed. It looks as though you're going to get them whether you mind or not.
I could give you literally any explanation about any topic in any level of detail, and if the result isn't something Donald Trump would be happy about then there's no chance you would ever understand it.
Give an explanation for why your "fact -checkers" made no mention of the manual recount that exposed the "glitch" then.
(post is archived)