WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

892

Election/Fraud Status Update: Here's a Map of Where We Are on Sunday Night 11/8/2020

https://jssocial.pw/ppkey/fget/pic8/upload/9O3dannFep.jpeg

Although, Trump's lawyer said that they will be recounting in ALL 30 states that used the same rigged software as used throughout Michigan.

Those 30 States, including California and New York and a lot of other BLUE states.....man that will be FUN to see that Trump REALLY did WIN a Coast to Coast Landslide Victory!


Reminder: NOT A SINGLE STATE has certified the election results.

https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results_certification_dates,_2020

Put Fraud aside for a moment, think of all the ballots they have to handle. Far more than normal years. Most states are still "counting".

#Election/Fraud Status Update: Here's a Map of Where We Are on Sunday Night 11/8/2020 https://jssocial.pw/ppkey/fget/pic8/upload/9O3dannFep.jpeg Although, Trump's lawyer said that they will be recounting in ALL 30 states that used the same rigged software as used throughout Michigan. Those 30 States, including California and New York and a lot of other BLUE states.....man that will be FUN to see that Trump REALLY did WIN a Coast to Coast Landslide Victory! ----- #Reminder: NOT A SINGLE STATE has certified the election results. https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results_certification_dates,_2020 Put Fraud aside for a moment, think of all the ballots they have to handle. Far more than normal years. Most states are still "counting".

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

lol they didn't "recount" 6,000 they just fixed an error uploading a count... common error you see when there are 51 simultaneous elections at once... also it looks like you don't know what you're talking about because that was about MI, not WI... Trump can't demand a recount in MI because that's not how their laws work

using dominion voting machine doesn't mean anything... these machines are already approved for use and you can't void all results just because you want to.... the only option would be to lobby the WI legislature to pass a law getting rid of the machines for 2022.... so yeah, not helpful to Trump

basically if a smaller state like WI is not within the automatic/machine recount margin, which looks like where the certificated count will be, the only reason to request a recount would be if paying for it was worth the potential for a super miracle (because again, recounts never change tens of thousands of votes... usually just hundreds or dozens) ONLY IF the election hinged on it

But Biden doesn't need WI. In fact, if you took away the states that are close enough to recount Biden still has enough.

Trump has no path.

[–] 1 pt

" [Search domain thefederalist.com/2020/11/06/software-glitch-in-michigan-county-tallied-6000-republican-votes-as-democrat/] https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/06/software-glitch-in-michigan-county-tallied-6000-republican-votes-as-democrat/"

"A glitch in software used to tabulate ballots in Antrim County, Michigan caused at least 6,000 Republican votes to be counted as Democrat, according to Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox."

Yeah, Michigan rather than Wisconsin. Big whoop. That was 6,000 votes in one county and the "glitch" was found by performing a manual recount of votes. There are 47 counties using the same hardware and software in Michigan, "Glitch" my shiny hiny. Get your head out of your ass.

[–] 0 pt

You're actually sorta right, even though you don't realize it. Almost always when people say "software glitch" they don't actually mean a bitflip kind of computer glitch or even a programming error.... almost always, like the 6,000 in MI, it's user error

How do I know this? Because I read reliable sources that don't purposely mislead you by failing to explain that and then failing to report on the truth when it comes out:

The software program, Election Source, worked properly and correctly counted votes, but the county missed an operation step, the statement said. This resulted in a miscommunication between the software and the county’s central election management system that was quickly corrected.

“This was an isolated error, there is no evidence this user error occurred elsewhere in the state, and if it did it would be caught during county canvasses, which are conducted by bipartisan boards of county canvassers.”

https://factcheck.afp.com/michigan-county-vote-count-glitch-was-not-fraud

Get bent, hoaxer

[–] 1 pt

Suuuure, "The software program, Election Source, worked properly and correctly counted votes, but the county missed an operation step..." Gee, an "operation step". In that case you won't mind a few random manual recounts to see if any other "operation steps" were missed. It looks as though you're going to get them whether you mind or not.