WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

Trump Attorney: Manual Recounts May Be Necessary in 30 States After Software “Glitch” Is Caught Erasing 6,000 Votes for Donald Trump in Just One County

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/trump-attorney-manual-recounts-may-necessary-30-states-software-glitch-caught-erasing-6000-votes-donald-trump-just-one-county/


Another ‘Computer Glitch’ Identified and Corrected in Oakland County, Michigan, Led to Republican Winning His Race

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/another-computer-glitch-identified-corrected-california-led-republican-winning-race/


HUGE! Corrupted Software Used in Michigan County that Stole 6,000 Votes from Trump — Is Also Used in ALL SWING STATES — PA, GA, NV, MI, WI, AZ, MN!

https://poal.co/s/QStorm/215415

#Trump Attorney: Manual Recounts May Be Necessary in 30 States After Software “Glitch” Is Caught Erasing 6,000 Votes for Donald Trump in Just One County https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/trump-attorney-manual-recounts-may-necessary-30-states-software-glitch-caught-erasing-6000-votes-donald-trump-just-one-county/ ---- **Another ‘Computer Glitch’ Identified and Corrected in Oakland County, Michigan, Led to Republican Winning His Race** https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/another-computer-glitch-identified-corrected-california-led-republican-winning-race/ ---- #HUGE! Corrupted Software Used in Michigan County that Stole 6,000 Votes from Trump — Is Also Used in ALL SWING STATES — PA, GA, NV, MI, WI, AZ, MN! https://poal.co/s/QStorm/215415

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Think of it like this.. A teacher purposely cheats 1 student (a county) out of an answer on a test in 1 classroom (a state). Now imagine that teacher has 30 different classrooms (states). Since that teacher cheated in the one classroom, wouldn't it be in the best interest of all involved to check and see if they did or didn't do the same in the other classrooms? Point being is that it was the same software that was used in the other states also. May be a bad analogy but this is the way I see it.

[–] 0 pt

no, you just make the one retest

[–] 0 pt

...and just leave the possibility that it happened other times out there? Only because it was caught in 1 county? If this "glitch" as they like to call it, happened once, it can damn well happen again.

[–] 0 pt

there's a difference between a glitch and a bug