WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

540

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

What?

The ballot's watermarked blockchain had GPS receivers?

  1. That would be illegal. That would allow them to trace my vote back to me. Which is illegal. When I vote, only I am allowed to know who I voted for. My vote can never legally be traced back to me.

  2. GPS located? If it's a mail in ballot, then maybe it could be traced back to an address (illegal as pointed out in #1). (And why use GPS when you can use an address?) But, a watermark having a GPS locator in it? It's a watermark, not a circuit board with a GPS antenna.

If every ballot had a watermark or some other security feature, that would make sense. Money has tons of security features if you're looking for some examples. And it is claimed by CISA that states use various security features on their ballots to prevent simple photocopying. But they make it sound like each state is responsible for printing their own ballots and the security features in them, not the federal government.

This means that if I photocopied a ballot, it could be detected as fake. But someone working for the state could print off millions of ballots that have all of the security features because they'd be printed from the same printer as the real ballots.

And GPS? A piece of paper does not have a GPS receiver or transmitter. A blockchain code doesn't have.... it's a code, a set of numbers and letters. There is no GPS locator in a code.

This is just someone spouting random buzzwords trying to discredit us and make us look like we're all stupid and crazy.

There are security features in ballots. Put there by the state. And if there are enough corrupt people working in that state, they can print off as many ballots as they want that will all have those security features.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah.

Lots of claims being thrown around, but are any substantiated? Unless concrete evidence exists, and is accessible, it's all just wishful thinking.